Dalton Board of Health Works to Modify its Demolition Guidelines Checklist

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — The Board of Health will collaborate with the building department to modify the demolition guidelines checklist. 
 
The current checklist does not clearly outline the board's responsibilities when approving a demolition or the items the board is responsible for, Health Agent Agnes Witkowski said. 
 
The building inspector suggested that the board adopt the checklist, which came from another town.
 
Previous board members approved adopting it in 2022 but since then people have been directed to go to the Board of Health regarding demolitions. This checklist is separate from the building department's demolition program. 
 
"My understanding is it is the building inspectors responsible to sign off on the permit. I know some Board of Health's would get a copy of the road report and asbestos report and give that to the building inspector but it seems like this is becoming more of a board of health's responsibility," Witkowski said. 
 
According to attorney Nicole Costanzo, state building codes require "jurisdictional cooperation" from a number of departments to provide assistance for the building inspector. The building inspector is responsible for ensuring all laws and ordinances are complied with. 
 
The building inspector does have a program that allows these various departments to go in and sign off on the demolition indicating they do not have any concerns or issues. This program also has a box so the department can include conditions or comments, Costanzo said. 
 
The Board of Health's checklist starts as an informational document to inform residents of the steps they need to take for demolition approval. 
 
"My understanding at one point was an information sheet to make sure that these things are being done but now it's becoming part of the Board of Health's responsibility to be collecting this, answering questions, guiding [the resident,] inspecting the building, and for all these things to be done," Witkowski said. 
 
"Versus this being a checklist that should be guiding people and then that information should be uploaded into the building inspectors [program] and if the building inspector has any questions then he would converse with the Board of Health."
 
The second page then requires the health agent to sign off on the document indicating they have completed an inspection and received certain disposal information from the resident. 
 
The Board of Health's document also has a building department checklist that appears to require the inspectional official, in this case Witkowski, to review and sign off on. 
 
"Our intent was to use this as an informational sheet to people for education so that they would have something right up front to know," Witkowski said. 
 
"Now it's becoming that I'm the one that's having to follow up on and being responsible for this and signing off on this, which before this information would be just uploaded into the building permit system."
 
Witkowski is now getting questions regarding demolitions that should be going to the building inspector. 
 
Based on how it is currently written the health agent would be required to sign this document before signing off on the building inspectors program. 
 
"I think that's the first thing that the board needs to determine what your what your guidelines in your checklist actually require and what the intent of that was, to give your inspectional agents some idea of what they're required to do when they receive a request from someone who's applied for a demolition permit," Costanzo said. 
 
"... looking at this, in my opinion I'm not aware of any regulation that requires a local Board of Health to certify compliance with asbestos regulations…with that exception, that the building code does require jurisdictional cooperation from the Board Of Health when the building inspector is seeking guidance from them with respect to issuance of any permits."
 
If an owner wants to tear down to remodel their home, the demolition permit should just go through the building department and if they have any questions the Board of Health could review the application, board member Edward Gero said. 
 
In cases where the demolition was court ordered due to situations overseen by the Health Department, whether it is rodents or public health issues, the Board of Health should then be required to review the application, he said. 

Tags: board of health,   demolition,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Council OKs Underground Fiber Network

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — More underground fiber internet cables will be installed in Pittsfield. 

On Tuesday, the City Council approved Gateway Fiber's request to install an underground fiber network infrastructure within the city's right-of-way.  

The company was given the go-ahead for an aerial network last year alongside Archtop Fiber, marking the beginning of construction with a ribbon-cutting at the Colonial Theatre. Gateway Fiber will offer subscription plans ranging from $65 to $150 per month, depending on speed. 

Wards 3 and 4 will see the most work in the first phase, according to an underground fiber deployment plan.  Fourteen streets in Ward 4 will see underground fiber deployment; 13 streets in Ward 3.  

Ward 4 Councilor James Conant voted in opposition for personal reasons, as he signed up for Gateway Fiber briefly last year and said he had poor service and poor communication from the company. 

Some councilors and community members appreciated bringing competition to Spectrum internet services. Ward 5 Councilor Patrick Kavey pointed out that it costs about $90 per month for 500 megabytes per second with Spectrum, and that all three fiber services that have come to Pittsfield are cheaper. 

Operations Manager Jennifer Sharick explained that they were seeking approval for underground fiber deployment as part of the next phase in Pittsfield. The city was found to be a "very" viable community for underground fiber. 

Gateway Fiber, she said, originally served a community of 250 residents outside of St. Louis, Mo. 

"Following the pandemic, we saw the need, and what people need for fiber and reliable internet service to bring residents and businesses the opportunity for connectivity," Sharick said. 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories