image description
Penny stands with her owner, Jonathan Moffat, during Wednesday's dangerous/nuisance dog hearing. The case against dismissed.

Adams Board Dismisses 'Dangerous' Case Against Penny

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Penny was mostly behaved during the session. The board voted unanimously to drop the complaint but reminded dog owners their animals must be leashed. Selectwoman Christine Hoyt recused herself from the hearing. 
ADAMS, Mass. — Charges of aggression against Penny the hound were dropped on Wednesday after her appearance at the Board of Selectmen resulted in licking faces, and a little whining.
 
However, all board members emphasized that dogs should always be leashed or fenced in when outside. 
 
Complaints had been filed against Penny and Mason, both Catahoula leopard dogs, for  "aggressively" charging at a family out walking with their dog. 
 
The dogs' owner, Jonathan Moffat, was unavailable at the hearing held in February, so the board voted to continue it to Wednesday. 
 
After meeting Penny, Animal Control Officer Kimberly Witek withdrew her recommendation to classify the dogs as a nuisance and to require them to be muzzled and leashed when outside the home.
 
"The original recommendation was to put a muzzle order in place. I would like to withdraw that, because the dog that was the biggest aggressor is no longer in the picture. Moffat brought the dog to me at the police station so I could meet her, I do not know how she is around other dogs," she said. 
 
"My recommendation is, when he's taking his dog from his house to his car, to have it on a leash or have a harness and just have a good hold in case there's another dog coming by, because I don't know how she is with other dogs." 
 
Moffat submitted the dogs' vaccination and licensing records, although Penny is not spayed. 
 
Brianna Shepherd, at February's hearing, stated that last November, two dogs chased her, her children (ages 1 and 4), her sister, and her own dog. 
 
On Wednesday, the board reopened the February hearing on dangerous dogs. After reviewing the case, they dismissed the complaint because of uncertainty about the events in question and concluded that neither dog was a nuisance or dangerous.
 
Mason was recently euthanized because of progressive epilepsy that could no longer be controlled with medication. 
 
The day of the incident all dogs involved were off-leash, which is a violation of the town's bylaws. All parties paid the fees associated with this. 
 
The penalty for dogs not physically restrained by leash when not on the owner's property is $50 per citation. Hunting dogs when being used for hunting or training are exempt.
 
Shepherd claimed they were four houses down from the owners' property on Grandview, when the dogs,  left their yard, "aggressively" charged at them unprovoked, and began to bite her dog.
 
She provided the board with a written affidavit of her experience, letters from neighbors who expressed similar experiences of the dogs leaving the property unleashed, and photos of cuts on a neighbor's dog, allegedly from an incident in 2023 involving Mason and Penny. 
 
Moffat claimed that Penny and Mason ran up to the petitioner's off-leash dog in the driveway to play and had "quite a lot of energy." 
 
He stated he remained in his truck and observed the entire incident, explaining that leaving the vehicle would encourage the dogs to run around and avoid getting in, as they often treat it as a game when both owners are outside.
 
"Penny is not dog aggressive, nor is she person aggressive … she still has quite a lot of energy and was wanting to play with a dog who just did not want to play with her. That's really what this boils down to–Penny wanted a friend, and that dog did not want to be her friend," Moffat said.
 
"It's an unfortunate situation, but no one was hurt, and I certainly don't think it's cause to bring this board together and set a finding of nuisance or dangerous dog." 
 
The complainant and respondent presented conflicting accounts of the November incident, which could not be independently verified, and no physical evidence was provided. 
 
"Essentially this situation comes down in my mind to it, 'he says, she said,' in terms of what actually, truly happened," said Selectman Jay Meczywor. 
 
"[It's] similar type stories, but in terms of the outcome and who's the aggressor, it just seems like there's a lot of gray area here."
 
Although the board dismissed the complaint, Meczywor cautioned that the owners be mindful of their neighbors, noting concerns raised in the numerous letters submitted. 
 
"Even if we do find that this isn't a dangerous or nuisance situation, this is on people's minds," he said. 

Tags: dangerous dog,   dogs,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Supporting Organizations That Keep Our Communities Strong

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

Berkshire County is home to many cultural gems, and the Berkshire Scenic Railway Museum (BSRM) is certainly one of them. Its Hoosac Valley Train Ride has become a cherished holiday tradition for families from near and far, offering a unique opportunity to experience our region's history, beauty, and sense of community.

It was heartbreaking to learn of the fire and the damage it caused. At the same time, it has been encouraging to see the determination of the Berkshire Scenic Railway Museum's team as they assess the damage, work toward repairs, and do everything possible to get the trains back in service and honor scheduled rides. Their commitment to rebuilding and moving forward is a testament to the passion and perseverance that keep BSRM alive.

The impact of the Berkshire Scenic Railway Museum extends well beyond the tracks. Here in Adams, the organization is an important part of our local economy. With approximately 10,000 riders annually, the Hoosac Valley Train Ride brings thousands of visitors to our community. Many of those visitors also spend time exploring our cultural attractions, dining at local restaurants, shopping at our businesses, and filling their gas tanks before heading home. That ripple effect matters, particularly to a small community like Adams.

I would also like to extend my sincere gratitude to the Adams Fire Department for its work to fight the fire. We are fortunate to have dedicated firefighters who respond when our community needs them most. Their service is a powerful reminder of the importance of the people who give their time, energy, and expertise to protect our neighbors, our history, and our community.

Volunteer organizations are often the backbone of our towns. Whether they are responding to emergencies, preserving our history, or creating meaningful experiences for families, these organizations bring people together and help make the Berkshires a place we are proud to call home. They deserve our recognition, our gratitude, and our support — not just in times of crisis, but throughout the year. I am grateful to the Berkshire Scenic Railway Museum for its determination and commitment to rebuilding, and to the Adams Fire Department for its service to our community.

I hope we will all do what we can to help the railway recover and continue sharing this special piece of Berkshire County history with future generations.

Christine Hoyt
Adams, Mass.

 

 

 

View Full Story

More Adams Stories