Lanesborough Voters Will Be Presented 2 Police Station Options

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Select Board will present two public safety facility designs to voters — though one appears more feasible.

This conversation was continued at last week's joint meeting with the Public Safety Building Committee.  The board again voted to advance a $7.3 million combined police/emergency medical services facility and a $6.5 million separate build.

Before it goes to town meeting, there will be another round of community input.

"When we get to town meeting, we don't have to present both of them if we're overwhelmed with people saying, 'Hey, let's just get the Police Department and EMS done," Select Board member Deborah Maynard said.

The 7,222 square-foot combined police and EMS build would cost about $7,365,868. Alternatively, a 4,814-square-foot police station with a separate two or three-bay EMS facility would $6,509,900. In 2023, voters rejected a proposed $5.9 million police/EMS complex but it was brought back because officials feel it is a good design.

All options would be constructed at 405 South Main St., the former Skyline Country Club.

Committee member Eric Harrington pointed out that the standalone EMS would be a Morton building, which is a fabricated metal structure.

"So you're fabricating a building that isn't what it's designed for," he said.

"That would be my concern is rushing to make a decision and put up a building that ultimately is not of the quality you would want to see here. Morton buildings are for vehicles, garage, storage, things like that, animals, not for office space and people. I think, myself, that would be a bad decision."

Selectman Timothy Sorrell wondered if the board should include the separate building proposal after being told that it wouldn't be worth the money.

"Not only does (a town survey) say that 36 percent of the population wants a combined police EMS station but only 6 percent want an EMS facility only," Public Safety Building Committee Chair Mark Siegars said.

"So they've answered that question already. They had a choice and they answered that question."


Sorrell successfully motioned to propose the combined police/EMS facility.  Maynard, who prefers the combined facility, then successfully motioned to bring forward separate and combined buildings to give taxpayers a choice.

"I really think the town should tell us, on a vote, in a proper vote, which way they want to go," she said.

Sorrell then motioned for the town to find a mechanism to get community input on the choices, which was supported unanimously.

Glen Storie, deputy chief and Fire Association president, detailed the struggles of having the fire and EMS departments operating out of the station at 180 South Main St., which is owned by the Fire Association.

Heads of both departments recognize it is not a permanent situation.

"It's to the point where  when we go down there to try to do something, (EMS) feel the need that they have to pack up and leave while we're at the station doing our meetings and things like that," he explained

"And same when we come back from a call, they're in the areas that we would normally go to de-stress and do things like that so we kind of tiptoe around each other trying to make it work."

Storie said EMS is welcome to stay until they find a suitable place.

"We are not going to ask them to leave," he added. "That would not do anybody any good. Wouldn't do the community any good. We will certainly continue to make it work the best we can until something changes."

EMS Director Jen Weber said she is not able to provide the proper facilities for her staff, explaining that they often feel like guests.

"We are the queens and kings of making do. We really are," she said.

"I mean, EMS gets the short end of the stick in a lot of places where sometimes you're crammed in an ambulance for 24 hours. So we've made do and we can continue to make do until something is suitable but it's really important that the town realizes the timeline of creating a professional department and their responsibility in making sure that they have the proper facilities for that."


Tags: Lanesborough Police Station,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Panel Supports Councilors' Privacy, Lake Management Commission

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Councilors believe they have the right to keep their home address off work documents

Last week, the Ordinances and Rules subcommittee voted to remove city councilors' addresses from public documents and create a Lake Management Commission for Pittsfield's waterbodies. 

Ward 4 Councilor James Conant, Ward 7 Councilor Katherine Moody, Ward 1 Councilor Kenneth Warren, and Ward 2 Councilor Cameron Cunningham submitted a request to remove councilors' addresses from city documents and websites and replace them with 70 Allen St., or City Hall, to improve safety. 

"As we know, especially over the weekend, there's just increasing violence in America at every level, from the president right on down. Governors, judges, mayors, city councilors," Conant said. 

"I feel that we can increase our security by stopping using our home addresses on city-issued websites and paperwork." 

City Solicitor Jeffrey Grandchamp pointed out that this will not prevent the city officials' addresses from becoming public, as their addresses are listed elsewhere as residents. 

Conant proposed to make it optional. 

Councilors couldn't find anything in the city code that requires them to use home addresses. Ward 5 Councilor Patrick Kavey pointed out that when you run for office, the City Clerk verifies your address and residency. 

"Looking at what other communities do, it does, again, look like we're kind of in the minority in terms of how much information we're putting out to the public," Ward 6 Councilor Dina Lampiasi observed. 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories