Lanesborough Voters Will Be Presented 2 Police Station Options

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Select Board will present two public safety facility designs to voters — though one appears more feasible.

This conversation was continued at last week's joint meeting with the Public Safety Building Committee.  The board again voted to advance a $7.3 million combined police/emergency medical services facility and a $6.5 million separate build.

Before it goes to town meeting, there will be another round of community input.

"When we get to town meeting, we don't have to present both of them if we're overwhelmed with people saying, 'Hey, let's just get the Police Department and EMS done," Select Board member Deborah Maynard said.

The 7,222 square-foot combined police and EMS build would cost about $7,365,868. Alternatively, a 4,814-square-foot police station with a separate two or three-bay EMS facility would $6,509,900. In 2023, voters rejected a proposed $5.9 million police/EMS complex but it was brought back because officials feel it is a good design.

All options would be constructed at 405 South Main St., the former Skyline Country Club.

Committee member Eric Harrington pointed out that the standalone EMS would be a Morton building, which is a fabricated metal structure.

"So you're fabricating a building that isn't what it's designed for," he said.

"That would be my concern is rushing to make a decision and put up a building that ultimately is not of the quality you would want to see here. Morton buildings are for vehicles, garage, storage, things like that, animals, not for office space and people. I think, myself, that would be a bad decision."

Selectman Timothy Sorrell wondered if the board should include the separate building proposal after being told that it wouldn't be worth the money.

"Not only does (a town survey) say that 36 percent of the population wants a combined police EMS station but only 6 percent want an EMS facility only," Public Safety Building Committee Chair Mark Siegars said.

"So they've answered that question already. They had a choice and they answered that question."


Sorrell successfully motioned to propose the combined police/EMS facility.  Maynard, who prefers the combined facility, then successfully motioned to bring forward separate and combined buildings to give taxpayers a choice.

"I really think the town should tell us, on a vote, in a proper vote, which way they want to go," she said.

Sorrell then motioned for the town to find a mechanism to get community input on the choices, which was supported unanimously.

Glen Storie, deputy chief and Fire Association president, detailed the struggles of having the fire and EMS departments operating out of the station at 180 South Main St., which is owned by the Fire Association.

Heads of both departments recognize it is not a permanent situation.

"It's to the point where  when we go down there to try to do something, (EMS) feel the need that they have to pack up and leave while we're at the station doing our meetings and things like that," he explained

"And same when we come back from a call, they're in the areas that we would normally go to de-stress and do things like that so we kind of tiptoe around each other trying to make it work."

Storie said EMS is welcome to stay until they find a suitable place.

"We are not going to ask them to leave," he added. "That would not do anybody any good. Wouldn't do the community any good. We will certainly continue to make it work the best we can until something changes."

EMS Director Jen Weber said she is not able to provide the proper facilities for her staff, explaining that they often feel like guests.

"We are the queens and kings of making do. We really are," she said.

"I mean, EMS gets the short end of the stick in a lot of places where sometimes you're crammed in an ambulance for 24 hours. So we've made do and we can continue to make do until something is suitable but it's really important that the town realizes the timeline of creating a professional department and their responsibility in making sure that they have the proper facilities for that."


Tags: Lanesborough Police Station,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Scenic Vistas, Open Spaces Central to Berkshire's Rural Character

By John TownesSpecial to iBerkshires
This is the first of a two-part series looking at types of land trusts, their missions and their place within the Berkshires.
 
Land is an essential resource for life. We all spend the vast majority of our lives directly connected to the land or in structures built on it. Land is also a central core of the global ecosystem that makes the earth sustainable for all lifeforms.
 
The landscape has special significance in the Berkshires. It is a central element in the region's scenic rural character and quality of life, as well an economic resource that is a basis of tourism.
 
Access to land, and control of its use, is largely based on ownership. This system enables people to own homes, build businesses, establish communities, and pursue other goals and activities.
 
However, the private use and control of land can also be a source of contention and conflict — from debates about development at local planning boards to international wars over territory.
 
Traditionally, local and regional planning policies and regulations such as zoning have been used to balance the concepts of private ownership with shared public goals and needs. In addition government ownership provides land for schools, roads, infrastructure, parks and nature preserves, and other public purposes.
 
In recent decades another form of land ownership and control has gained increasing visibility and prominence. This concept is often known as land trusts.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories