EPA Extends Deadline for Evaluating PCB Reduction Proposals at GE/Housatonic Site

Print Story | Email Story
BOSTON — The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced the extension of the deadline to evaluate proposals received for the Reducing Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) Concentrations and/or Toxicity in Soil and Sediment at the GE-Pittsfield/Housatonic River Site Challenge due to the number of proposals submitted.
 
A total of 98 solutions were received from 40 countries, including the United States, Brazil, Canada, Columbia, Jamaica, France, Belgium, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy, Germany, Russia, Czechia, Switzerland, Egypt, Israel, Greece, Spain, Morocco, Romania, Bulgaria, Nigeria, Algeria, Pakistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Oman, Kenya, South Africa, Rwanda, India, China, Bangladesh, Thailand, Taiwan, Malaysia, Indonesia, Vietnam, Australia, and Japan.
 
The judging panel, which does not include the EPA Site Case Team, is moving 48 solutions forward. Solution quality was determined by Wazoku, a national contractor who implements Challenges for the Federal Government. Due to the number of responses from contributors and to provide adequate review time by the judging panel, the Challenge judging period is being extended to Feb. 10, 2025.
 
The EPA launched the Reducing Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) Concentrations and/or Toxicity in Soil and Sediment at the GE-Pittsfield/Housatonic River Site Challenge in September 2024. In the 2020 Settlement Agreement EPA agreed to "facilitate opportunities for research and testing of innovative treatment and other technologies and approaches for reducing PCB toxicity and/or concentrations in excavated soil and/or sediment before, during, or after disposal in a landfill."
 
An inexpensive and efficient method for reducing PCB concentrations and/or toxicity in soil and sediment could greatly benefit cleanups of all PCB contaminated sites.
 
The Challenge was posted for approximately 60 days and initially involved a 30-day evaluation period, originally ending on December 12, 2024.
 
The entries are evaluated by a panel of judges comprised of both federal representatives, academia, and private community member(s). The best solutions in this Prize Challenge could win an award of $30,000 for meeting all solution requirements.
 
The initial phase, Phase 1, of this Challenge is the ideation phase. If Phase 1 of the Challenge successfully identifies a vendor (or vendors) who have proposed promising and practical solutions, then those vendors would be selected as winners of Phase 1 of the Challenge. EPA may then proceed to Phase 2, the proof-of-concept phase. The proof-of-concept Phase would likely include a pilot or bench scale testing of the technology. 
 
Although funded by EPA Region 1, the EPA Case Team for the GE-Pittsfield/Housatonic River Site will not participate in the Challenge process or the judging of submitted entries.
 
EPA supports the use and implementation of applicable technologies to reduce PCB concentrations and toxicity. If both Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the Challenge successfully identify a cost-effective solution that will make a real difference in the cleanup, EPA Region 1 commits to considering the applicability of the solution to the cleanup potentially through the Final Permit's adaptive management provisions or other Permit/Consent Decree provisions.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Council OKs Privacy Measure, Sees Bridge Update

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

The state plans to remove some of crumbling concrete on the Dalton Avenue bridge and wrap its repairs into a project with the rail trail. 

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The City Council is taking steps to protect its own privacy, as well as public comment speakers' privacy. 

On Tuesday, councilors voted to remove their home addresses from city documents and websites and replace them with 70 Allen St., or City Hall, to improve safety. It was brought forward by Ward 4 Councilor James Conant, Ward 7 Councilor Katherine Moody, Ward 1 Councilor Kenneth Warren, and Ward 2 Councilor Cameron Cunningham. 

"This is an easy proposal to support," Ward 6 Councilor Dina Lampiasi said. 

While this doesn't completely block their addresses from public view, as they are listed elsewhere as residents, it makes them a little harder to access. 

Moody pointed out that a Virginia city councilor was set on fire last year by a member of the public. NBC News reported that the attack stemmed from a personal matter. 

"I don't think anybody worries about me being able to defend myself, but I do have children, and I worry for them," Moody explained. 

Warren pointed out that they have done the same for those who speak at public comment. When he was first elected into office years ago, people picketed at his home for his stance on a School Committee issue. 

"Back then, it wasn't that big a deal. Now we find ourselves in very divisive times," Warren said. 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories