State Unemployment and Job Estimates for October

Print Story | Email Story

BOSTON, Mass, — The state's October total unemployment rate was 3.9 percent, a 0.1 percentage point increase from the revised September estimate of 3.8 percent, the Executive Office of Labor and Workforce Development announced.

The Massachusetts unemployment rate was 0.2 percentage points lower than the national rate of 4.1 percent reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). Over-the-year, the state's seasonally adjusted unemployment rate was up by 0.5 percentage points.

The labor force increased by an estimated 3,000 from the revised estimate of 3,850,600 in September, with 300 more residents employed and 2,900 more residents unemployed over-the-month. The state's labor force participation rate – the total number of residents 16 or older who worked or were unemployed and actively sought work in the last four weeks – remained steady at 66.4 percent. Compared to October 2023, the labor force participation rate increased by 1.4 percentage points over-the-year.

The BLS preliminary job estimates for Massachusetts decreased by 200 jobs in October. This follows September's revised loss of 1,800 jobs. The largest over-the-month private sector job gains were in Leisure and Hospitality, Financial Activities, and Manufacturing. Employment now stands at 3,744,300. Massachusetts gained 680,800 jobs since the employment low in April 2020.

From October 2023 to October 2024, BLS estimates Massachusetts gained 32,900 jobs. The largest over-the-year gains occurred in Education and Health Services, Leisure and Hospitality, and Government.

October 2024 Employment Overview

Leisure and Hospitality gained 1,600 jobs over-the-month. Over-the-year, 7,700 were added.

Financial Activities gained 1,300 jobs over-the-month. Over-the-year, 300 were added.

Construction gained 300 jobs over-the-month. Over-the-year, 4,700 were added.

Manufacturing gained 300 jobs over-the-month. Over-the-year, 3,000 were lost.

Other Services gained 100 jobs over-the-month. Over-the-year, 2,100 were added.

Professional, Scientific, and Business Services lost 100 jobs over-the-month. Over-the-year, 3,600 were added.

Information lost 200 jobs over-the-month. Over-the-year, 3,800 were lost.

Trade, Transportation, and Utilities lost 800 jobs over-the-month. Over-the-year, 1,300 were lost.

Government lost 1,000 jobs over-the-month. Over-the-year, 5,800 were added.

Education and Health Services lost 1,700 jobs over-the-month. Over-the-year, 16,800 were added.

Labor Force Overview

The October estimates show 3,704,000 Massachusetts residents were employed and 149,700 were unemployed, for a total labor force of 3,853,600. The unemployment rate at 3.9 percent was 0.1 percentage point higher than the revised September rate of 3.8 percent. Over-the-month, the October labor force increased by 3,000 from 3,850,600 in September, with 300 more residents employed and 2,900 more residents unemployed. The labor force participation rate, the share of the working age population employed and unemployed, remained at 66.4 percent. The labor force was up 98,400 from the October 2023 estimate of 3,755,200 following the annual revision, with 75,900 more employed residents, and 22,600 more unemployed residents.

The unemployment rate is based on a monthly sample of households. The job estimates are derived from a monthly sample survey of employers. As a result, the two statistics may exhibit different monthly trends.

The labor force is the sum of the numbers of employed residents and those unemployed, that is, residents not working but actively seeking work in the last four weeks. Estimates may not add up to the total labor force due to rounding.

For further information on seasonal adjustment methodology, please refer to the Bureau of Labor Statistics website https://www.bls.gov.

The preliminary November 2024 and revised October 2024 unemployment rate, labor force, and job estimates for Massachusetts will be released on Friday, December 20, 2024. See the 2024 Media Advisory annual schedule for a complete list of release dates.

Detailed labor market information is available at www.mass.gov/economicresearch.  

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Fenton: Governor's Council Must Deliver for the Berkshires

Community submissionGuest Column
I am a Springfield lawyer running for Governor's Council and I am asking for Berkshire County residents to support me over an incumbent from North Adams. 
 
Here's why: Last year I learned about staffing issues in our regional courts that I could not ignore. In 2025, it was reported that four of Western Massachusetts' 11 Superior Court judgeships were vacant, all at the same time. A few weeks later, that grew to five vacancies. This meant there were only six Superior Court judges serving all of Western Mass at a time when Berkshire, Hampshire, Franklin, and Hampden counties had more than 100 pending homicide cases. 
 
Those numbers were alarming to me, so I started to engage with leaders in the community who work most closely with the court system and I came to learn that these vacancies were only the tip of the iceberg here in Berkshire County.
 
I learned that no Superior Court or District Court judge had been appointed from the Berkshires since the current incumbent took office. As a result, there is not a single Superior Court judge who lives in the Berkshires today, and several of the District Court judges drive in from other counties to support Berkshire courts in Pittsfield, Great Barrington, and North Adams. Court staff also informed me about severe staffing shortages at the Berkshire Clerk of Courts office resulting in other counties needing to loan staff to the Berkshires just so hardworking employees can take a brief and planned summer vacation. This is not normal. These issues are a reflection of genuine problems with the Berkshire County court system and show a lack of proactive attention from our Governor's Councilor.
 
Instead of focusing on regional equity, I watched as the current incumbent celebrated that she has voted against the governor's nominees more than any other councilor, without much explanation as to why. Most recently, she voted against two extremely qualified former prosecutors for the Parole Board. This was despite an in-person plea from the governor and a letter of support from all the three of the district attorney's from Western Mass. Those votes do not show independence or standing up for principles, they demonstrate naivete, and an unwillingness to work with the key stakeholders.
 
I had seen and heard enough. I decided to jump in the race and challenge the incumbent to address these problems head-on.
 
I am a partner of a regional law firm. I understand our courts and the importance of having qualified, fair and hardworking judges. And I know how important it is to have judges from the Berkshires serving the Berkshires. To achieve that, you need strong relationships with the legal community and local stakeholders. You need to know how to use the power of the Governor's Council to fight forcefully for our region. And you need to be laser focused on identifying vacancies before they occur so that they can be filled quickly with local candidates.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories