image description
Demolition of GE's Building 12 was halted temporarily after a single air sample found PCBs exceeding the 'action level.' The demolition of Building 12 and 14 on the PEDA site have been completed.

GE Buildings 12 & 14 Demolished in Pittsfield

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass.— General Electric's former Buildings 12 and 14 are demolished and the debris will soon be capped.

Last week, the public health and safety subcommittee received an update on the project that was paused over the summer after air sampling detected an exceedance of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs.)

Authorities said the measurements are "conservative" and do not threaten public health.

Work to demolish the two buildings began last year and was completed in September after it was temporarily halted on July 25. Debris will be set off-site for disposal at the end of the year, and the subsurface vaults will be sealed and capped soon after.

Richard Fisher, remedial project manager for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Region 1, emphasized that the monitors around the perimeter that borders Tyler Street Extension did not show an exceedance.

"The public was not widely informed of this contamination, and no effort appeared to be made to trace it to GE property," argued Valerie Anderson, a member of the EPA GE Citizens Coordinating Council.

"Toxic contamination still abounds in Pittsfield."

At the beginning of the meeting, a couple of residents voiced concerns about PCB contamination in Pittsfield and its effect on public health. Also on the agenda was an annual update on the Hill 78 and Building 71 capped landfills that abut Allendale School.

The GE buildings' demolition is not covered by the consent decree for PCB remediation and required state and local permits. Debris including steel and crushed concrete were consolidated in sub-surface vaults in the Building 12 complex, which is covered by the consent decree.

Asbestos, liquids, hazardous materials, intact drums, capacitors, or universal wastes were shipped off-site prior to demolition.

Restoration plans are not yet finalized but GE is consulting with the city and anticipates implementation of the restoration work next year.


"Air monitoring was conducted at six locations on the site perimeter for PCBs. It was conducted weekly to start, then adjusted to monthly, and then reverted back to weekly due to an action level exceedance," Fisher reported.

"There was one exceedance of the action level and notification level and it was on the adjacent PEDA work site."

Because PEDA was conducting redevelopment work on Site 9 at almost the same time, it had an air monitoring program around the perimeter of the work and the exceedance was found next to Building 12.

"These levels are incredibly conservative and they're based on very long-term potential risk, like a long-term exposure to create the risk," Fisher said.

"But we still monitor these and use that level just to sort of require engineering controls to be implemented if it starts going up to just to get it right back down so there is no long-term exposure."

All of PEDA's air monitoring data was below the notification and action level aside from that one sample, he reported, and all of GE's PCB data is non-detect except for two samples.

Councilor at Large Kathy Amuso asked why there was an elevated level of PCBs on July 24.

"I don't want to speculate on exactly what the root cause was but I will say at the same time, in the same time period that the air monitors that are more reflective of public safety, which are all around the perimeter where air could get into the neighborhoods. None of those, you know, triggered any notification or action level," Fisher said.

"And it was right where GE was taking down a very large building. I don't know what the conditions were at the time, but that's why we would tell GE to stop work, figure out a way to make that not happen, and they couldn't start doing the work again until the air monitoring showed that the levels were all back down low again."

He added that PEDA had finished the work that required air monitoring after the detection, so there is no August data from the same monitor.

In August, Mill Town Capital announced that it would purchase 4.7 acres of Site 9, William Stanley Business Park's largest parcel. The investment firm's vision includes evaluating the development of a commercial building upwards of 20,000 square feet to provide office and lab space for growing local businesses.

Ward 2 Councilor Brittany Noto asked if there will be air monitoring in the new construction on the PEDA site. Fisher said if the groundwater data doesn't indicate a need, he doesn't see why that would be necessary.

"Strictly speaking about the groundwater as a source, the levels in the groundwater don't support the need," he said, adding that it would be a city decision.


Tags: contamination,   demolition,   General Electric,   PCBs,   PEDA,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories