Letter: Homeless Families at MCLA a Misguided Effort

Letter to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

It has been 24 years since Mass MoCA opened and I'm still waiting for the seismic shift in our economy and downtown that MoCA's developers promised. Main and Eagle Streets are still largely empty and depressing. While MoCA has certainly helped in many ways, its presence has failed to impact our downtown. Why?

Because North Adams does not suffer from a quick-fix acute illness. But rather, it has a very real chronic disease, poverty. The cure for this disease is societal, far beyond the ability and efforts of any single poor city or single state economic development project, like MoCA.

One thing is certain, purposefully concentrating more poor people in already poor places appears to be the rule. Not to solve the problem, but to hide it from the more affluent places, while also giving them opportunity to feel benevolent about having found a humane solution to homelessness. It's no surprise that Salem (home of Salem State University) and Buzzards Bay (home of the Maritime Academy), both with median incomes of about $37,000, are already hosting homeless families at their college facilities.

President Birge's misguided effort to house 50 homeless families lacks any foresight of its larger impact on North Adams and any positive vision for a brighter future for North Adams. Could the bar be set any lower? Is that really the best use of those buildings to serve the college and our community? Does he really believe this would be temporary housing? In 18 months is he going to evict them and make them homeless again?

I am not heartless. I certainly have empathy for those 50 homeless families and I hope they find shelter ASAP. But, not here. I just don't accept that this is the only or best solution to the problem of homelessness.


According to the article in iBerkshires: "The college is estimated to receive just under $2.7 million for use of the currently vacant towers." Plus an unspecified amount for a contract ServiceNet to manage the buildings.

$2.7 million to house 50 families = $54,000 per family = $148 per night. My guess is that there are some struggling hotels and motels in the state, possibly even in Williamstown, that would love an 18-month contract for full occupancy with guaranteed payment. And, the state would save the money on the service contract!

Let's not forget that Alternative Living Centers, a housing program for recovering addicts, is located on Montana Street. Again, something critically needed. Yet, again, located in North Adams. Not to mention that the MCLA campus will be bound on two sides; homeless housing for 50 families on Church Street and a drug recovery housing project on Montana Street. That's not a great marketing plan for MCLA to attract more students. In fact, I suspect it will kill enrollment and the college.

This city has hosted a disproportionate number of poor people for 50 years. Let some other city/town, say one with a median income of $120,000.00, share and assume some of the burdens that poverty places on this city and hold it back from a more promising future.

Our downtown will never thrive until we have at least a modest demographic shift to include more people with disposable incomes, who live here year-round, to shop in stores and eat in restaurants.

This idea of importing more poor people is an awful and destructive idea for both MCLA and North Adams.

Peter May
North Adams, Mass.

 

 

 

 


Tags: homeless,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Clarksburg Students Write in Support of Rural School Aid

By Tammy DanielsiBerkshires Staff

Mason Langenback calculated that Clarksburg would get almost $1 million if the $60 million was allocated equally.
CLARKSBURG, Mass. — Eighth-graders at Clarksburg School took a lesson in civic advocacy this week, researching school funding and writing letters to Beacon Hill that call for fully funding rural school aid. 
 
The students focused on the hardships for small rural schools and their importance to the community — that they struggle with limited funding and teacher shortages, but offer safe and supportive spaces for learning and are a hub for community connections.
 
"They all address the main issue, the funding for rural schools, and how there's a gap, and there's the $4 million gap this year, and then it's about the $40 million next year, and that rural schools need that equitable funding," said social studies teacher Mark Karhan.
 
A rural schools report in 2022 found smaller school districts cost from nearly 17 percent to 23 percent more to operate, and recommended "at least" $60 million be appropriated annually for rural school aid. 
 
Gov. Maura Healey has filed for more Chapter 70 school aid, but that often is little help to small rural schools with declining or static enrollment. For fiscal 2027, she's budgeted $20 million for rural schools, up from around $13 million this year but still far below the hoped for $60 million. 
 
Karhan said the class was broken into four groups and the students were provided a submission letter from Rural Schools Advocacy. The students used the first paragraph, which laid out the funding facts, and then did research and wrote their own letters. 
 
They will submit those with a school picture to the governor. 
 
View Full Story

More North Adams Stories