Special Meeting Set for PHS Statement of Interest

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The School Building Needs Commission will hold a special meeting on Monday to decide if Pittsfield should seek funding from the Massachusetts School Building Authority to repair its oldest high school, PHS. 

It was stipulated that if funding for the city's 20 percent match needs to be identified right now, the SOI is not currently feasible. During the commission's meeting on Tuesday, members were not comfortable moving forward without seeing the document and knowing if the money needs to be identified upfront. 

Mayor Peter Marchetti still had a "bunch" of questions and concerns.  

"I look at where we are today: We have a middle school restructuring project underway. We have a Crosby/Conte project underway with still no estimate of what that dollar might be, so let's just say it's a $100 million school, that's $20 million on the city taxpayers to do," he cautioned. 

"Now we're going to turn around and do PHS, very little research. The number that I've seen is $73.5 [million.] By the time we get the construction and five years from now, let's put that at $100 [million.] That's another $20 million on the taxpayers to be able to do, and we have been advised by our city auditor that we're at our following capacity from an operating budget standpoint." 

The commission plans to see and vote on an SOI on April 13 at 5 p.m. at Taconic High School.
Interim Superintendent Latifah Phillips identified Pittsfield High School renovations for MSBA's core program, which has a statement of interest filing period open until April 17. According to MSBA's website, the core program is intended for new construction, addition, and/or renovation projects. 

To her understanding, there would be no negative implications if the Pittsfield Public Schools were accepted into the funding program and pulled out because of lack of funds, she said, "But we do recognize that the financing of the project would have to be carefully considered." 


A SOI would go to the School Committee and City Council for a vote. Co-Chair Frank LaRagione said Pittsfield can submit an SOI again in two years if not on April 17. 

Pittsfield High School was founded in 1844, and the current building opened in 1931. A couple of years ago, the school's three inefficient, original-to-the-building boilers were replaced

City officials say PHS needs a new roof, new windows, improved infrastructure, and repairs to the dome. 

"I think a roof, windows, and infrastructure are a minimum. That's my opinion of it. How we go about that, which avenue, I don't know, but I'm guessing the things we just talked about right there, I would say we're probably in the $35 to $40 million range," Building Maintenance Director Brian Filiault estimated. 

"… If you want to get into the whole thing and do it properly, and abate the whole building and clean it all out, much bigger project, you're talking to $70-something million." 

Marchetti said they may want to pursue some other avenues, potentially the accelerator repair program, which covers items like roofs, windows and heating and cooling. 

Pittsfield is seeking up to 80 percent reimbursement from the MSBA to rebuild and consolidate John C. Crosby Elementary and Silvio O. Conte Community School on the Crosby property. 

The MSBA invited the district to a feasibility study phase, and a selection committee chose Skanska as the owner's project manager, a hired consultant that oversees a construction or design project in the owner's interest. PPS is waiting for approval for the OPM appointment. 


Tags: MSBA,   PHS,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories