Pittsfield Seeks Input on CDBG Spending

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The city is seeking input on where this year's Community Development Block Grant dollars should be allocated. 

A public hearing was held on Tuesday at Berkshire Athenaeum. Nate Joyner, Pittsfield's community development and housing program manager, believes this was the city's 51st CDBG hearing. 

Last year, Pittsfield received about $1.2 million from the federal government for projects involving public facilities, public services, housing rehabilitations and demolitions, and economic development. This year's allocation is expected to be around the same. 

"It's a federal program intended to provide decent, safe, and sanitary housing, provide a suitable living environment, and expand economic opportunities for primarily low and moderate-income residents," he explained. 

"There are some rules on how those funds can be spent, but a minimum of 70 percent of the funds need to directly benefit what they call low or moderate income people, and no more than 30 percent of the funds can be used to address slum or blight." 

On Tuesday, snow and slush washed over the region, affecting the turnout at the hearing and canceling other events that day. 

The Department of Community Development is preparing to draft its 2026 Annual Action Plan for the federal funds, with the program year beginning July 1. The U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development provides CDBG funds annually under Title 1 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended.

A draft Annual Action Plan will be available on the city website beginning April 21, and a 30-day public comment period will follow.  There will be a public hearing for the plan on May 5 at City Hall.

The city is also conducting an online survey through March 20 that is expected to take 10-15 minutes to complete. 



Program eligibility guidelines define low income as ranging from $25,800 to $68,800 for one person, and between $36,850 and $98,250 for a household of four people. 

For FY 2026, the HUD Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program is poised to receive $3.3 billion in funding, maintaining the same level as FY 2025. 

Joyner reviewed last year's impact with the funds. 

In 2025, ten owner-occupied and renter-occupied units were rehabilitated, two new accessible ramps were placed on homes, and three condemned properties were demolished. On the public services and facilities side, Pittsfield saw sidewalk and curb ramps replaced in the Westside, an accessible bathroom at the Berkshire Athenaeum, neighborhood cleanups, and funding to 10 non-profits. 

The CDBG funds also provided technical assistance grants to for-profit businesses and led to the creation of 10 new jobs, and assisted local "micro-enterprises," which have no more than five employees. 

Of last year's more than $2 million budget, 52 percent of the CDBG funding went to housing rehab and demolitions, and 24 percent of the funds went to public facilities. The rest went to public services (13 percent) and economic development. (11 percent) 

The Human Services Advisory Council reviews applicable CDBG funding proposals, the Pittsfield Economic Revitalization Corporation reviews economic development proposals, and housing and applications have another process. 

Joyner explained that the city doesn't see many proposals for other projects, but the department reviews them when they come in.


Tags: CDBG,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories