Pittsfield Licensing Board Hikes Fees

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — During a brief meeting on Monday, the Licensing Board approved new fees for fiscal year 2027 and upgraded the Barrington Stage Company's liquor license.

This meeting had been postponed twice because of snowstorms on Jan. 26 and Feb. 23. 

The City Clerk's Office joined the Building Department, Board of Health, and Zoning Board of Appeals to update Pittsfield's fee schedule for the first time in 10 to 25 years, depending on the department. The group compared licensing fees in other Berkshire communities as well as Springfield, Chicopee, Northampton, and Holyoke. 

Chair Thomas Campoli observed that some of the increases are between 25 and 27 percent, and that the fees haven't been updated for "Oh, the many years." 

Assistant City Clerk Heather Brazeau reported that Licensing Board fees have not been updated since 2017. She recognized that no one wants to ask businesses for additional money, but said Pittsfield's rates are low compared to surrounding communities.

"We looked at all of the other communities, kind of figured out what would be in the middle, what would be fair, how much of an increase there would be the first time, so that people weren't so taken aback," she explained. 

The city has 38 seven-day, all-alcohol annual licenses that will increase from $1,175 to $1,500, generating $57,000 per year. There are 12 package store licenses that will increase from $1,600 to $2,000. Between the 112 total liquor license increases, Pittsfield will see an incremental revenue increase of $25,170, totaling $142,200 in yearly revenue. 
 
Great Barrington charges $1,100 and Lanesborough charges $1,250 for an annual all-alcohol restaurant license. The average cost among nearby communities is about $1,700. The city of Northampton charges $2,259, and the city of Springfield charges $2,800. Holyoke only charges $1,000 per year for the license.

BSC's Sydelle and Lee Blatt Performing Arts Center at 36 Linden St. can now serve all alcohol, instead of being limited to wine and malt beverages. The facility houses the 132-seat St. Germain Stage and Mr. Finn's Cabaret, a 99-seat cabaret space in the lower level of the building.

A state law passed last year allows restaurants and bars with existing wine and malt beverage licenses to convert their licenses to all-alcohol licenses. 

On the agenda was an update from Chili's on its liquor license for the shuttered Berkshire Crossing location, but no representatives from the company attended the meeting, and it was continued. 



The restaurant closed abruptly in August 2024 and has been looking for a buyer for over a year.  Representatives have come before the board a few times with reports that there are interested parties, but no sale. 

Last fall, Campoli reminded the company that under state law, if a licensee is not operating, the board has to "turn up the heat" to see if the license can be transferred or the venue reopened under a different owner. 

At this meeting, they planned to discuss whether to begin the six months that the business has to reopen or sell its liquor license. The current lease agreement goes out to 2029, and the company, Pepper Dining Inc., is looking for another business to carry it out.


Tags: license board,   alcohol license,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories