Lanesborough Planners Try to Keep Up With Bylaw Readings

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Select Board got an earful last week on the Planning Board's efforts to deal with short-term rentals. 
 
Planning Board Vice Chair Joe Trybus asked at the meeting if they knew that short-term rentals weren't allowed to operate in Lanesborough.
 
"I would like to know who actually knew that short-term rentals were not allowed," he said. "I even asked, you know anybody here? Because I gotta tell you something, the only reason it was discussed was to regulate them in some way, not that they weren't allowed. We all thought they were allowed."
 
Select Board member Michael Murphy said the building inspector knew and brought it to their attention.
 
"Didn't bring it to mine," responded Trybus. "You know who brought it to my attention? To be honest, it was the gentleman that owns the coffee shop. I stopped in to see how the business was. Had a cup of coffee, and honestly, it was a really good cup of coffee. And the guy got my ear. He didn't know who I was, and he said that he was getting bullied from the town."
 
The building inspector issued a cease-and-desist order to Second Drop Farm in January to shut down the short-term rental it was operating, saying it was not allowed. The farm's attorney argued that the town's bylaws recognize STRs through restrictions on parking and through taxation but the Zoning Board of Appeals upheld the violation. 
 
 
Trybus said the planners at their Feb. 17 discussed making changes to the bylaws that could be voted at the town's annual meeting. 
 
"Short-term rentals is defined as 31 days or less. That's how we're going to do it. It's not 30, it's 31 OK, a registration and inspection was tabled until the next meeting," he said. "There's a little bit of arguing going on between the board to come up with a solution for that one."
 
The board tabled the discussion on inspection and registration until the March meeting but had talked about fees.
 
"So somebody comes in, registers into town, whatever paperwork we're going to have in place for that is probably like registering a business," said Trybus. "You come in, you sign your name. I don't even think there's a fee for it or we could decide that there's a $20 fee or $100 fee. I don't know when that happens. And one of the board members said, we can just make that in addition to permitize therefore the inspector gets zapped right away, and then he has to go out and do an inspection."
 
The board had also tabled ownership and entity limits but had agreed on a cap on how many days a unit could be rented out during year.
 
"Again, the board argued this a little bit, but it was voted they're allowed 365 days. I think that's a win, just my opinion," Trybus said.
 
The board had also moved forward a draft of parking restrictions, stating off-street parking is required with at least two parking spaces or, if there are three bedrooms, three parking spaces.
 
The Planning Board had also tabled a discussion on accessory dwelling units (ADU) to be used as STRs until the next meeting.
 
Murphy expressed admiration for how the Planning Board had handled those conversations.
 
"I want to commend you and the rest of that board for having — a I know it's just starting — but a thoughtful conversation," he said. "If you haven't watched that Planning Board meeting, I highly recommend you watch every minute of it to see what this board has gone through."
 
Trybus encouraged officials to speak with town residents to get some turnout at town meeting, saying too often "It's the same faces."
 
Murphy noted there were only 98 people at the last town meeting who voted.
 
"So if the townspeople, and I hope they're watching, if you really want short-term rentals in Lanesborough, you better go vote," Trybus said.
 
Trybus also discussed signage with the board, saying he didn't understand why the Country Store wouldn't have taken the small sign down if only one is allowed.
 
Murphy thought it was because there are other businesses in the location.
 
Trybus said he personally didn't feel there was anything wrong with the signage and Select Board member Jason Breault said the town should be working harder to promote more business and that over-restricting signage may hurt businesses.
 
The sign installed in the bed of the Lanesborough Local Country Store was found to be in violation, a finding also upheld by the ZBA and which is the subject of a lawsuit against the town. 
 
Trybus said he will plan to bring up the idea for two signs at 50 square feet per business instead of one to the Planning Board and will also look to see what the public says.
 
"If you want bigger signs and more of them, I can try to get the whole Planning Board to agree to write something up like that and bring it to the annual town meeting, and you can see what your public says," he said. "Because, again, it's not us. We can only bring it to them. We can only bring it to the people, and we'll let them decide."
 

Tags: Planning Board,   short-term rentals,   signage,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories