image description

Super Says Pittsfield Schools in 'Turnaround'

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — While the Pittsfield Public Schools are not formally identified as a turnaround district, interim Superintendent Latifah Phillips has declared it as such. 

Two-thirds of Pittsfield schools need focused or targeted assistance, according to 2025 accountability data from the Department of Secondary and Elementary Education. The district's suspension rate is also four times the state average, and principals don't find their jobs manageable. 

"We are a district in turnaround, and, no, we have not received a district designation identifying us as that, but I am naming us as that in looking at our data," Phillips said during last week's School Committee meeting. 

The administration will present a draft fiscal year 2027 budget on March 11, and has been focused on equitably distributing resources based on need while bridging a $4 million funding gap without layoffs. 

In Massachusetts, a turnaround district is a school district designated as underperforming or chronically underperforming (Level 4 or 5) by DESE because of sustained low student performance on the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System exams. Pittsfield has seven schools performing in the bottom quartile of the commonwealth, including both middle and high schools: 

  • Crosby Elementary School 
  • Conte Community School
  • Morningside Community School 
  • Reid Middle School / Herberg Middle School 
  • Taconic High School 
  • Pittsfield High School 

Crosby, Conte, and Morningside have between 5 and 7 percent accountability scores, indicating that between 93 and 95 percent of state elementary schools are performing higher. On the other hand, five elementary schools were identified as high growth and moving toward high achievement: Allendale, Capeless, Egremont, Stearns, and Williams. 

In 2024, Williams was designated as a National Blue Ribbon School by the U.S. Department of Education.

"I share this because when you look at how we are distributing funding, we're acknowledging that some schools may need more than others in order for us to bring everyone up," Phillips explained. 

For 2025, DESE has the district listed as "not requiring assistance or intervention" or an overall classification because the district is making "moderate progress towards targets." 

Phillips was appointed to lead the district last summer and has been gathering data to measure its current conditions and what can be done to improve student and staff experience. She shared her initial findings about PPS in advance of the budget discussion, explaining that it follows the same strategy. 

During this process, zero percent of principals reported their role as manageable. This results in high turnover and schools that are always in flux, she said. 


Teachers also reported being "heavily impacted" by a high volume of behavioral incidents and a lack of specialized support. PPS has one of the highest suspension rates in Massachusetts, and students with disabilities account for 50 percent of suspensions. 

Interim Special Education Director Melissa Brites gave a presentation on the department during the meeting. Pittsfield was identified as having disproportionate suspension data, especially for students with disabilities, and submitted documentation around its policies, procedures, and practices in October.

"I'm really happy to announce that when we got our findings back in early January, in early February, that we were 100 percent compliant with all of our practices policies around student discipline," she reported. 

"So, although we still find that we have some disproportionate data, we have really strong practices in writing and as part of our documentation that can help drive those improvements. We have no further action to take, other than to really work on our suspension rate." 

Phillips shared the district values that attracted her to the position: Pittsfield's vision to create a supportive, equitable, and challenging learning environment where all students experience joy and learning while becoming intellectually, emotionally, and socially ready to succeed through graduation and beyond.

Pittsfield is seeking up to 80 percent reimbursement from the Massachusetts Schools Building Authority to rebuild and consolidate John C. Crosby Elementary and Silvio O. Conte Community School on the Crosby property.

Running alongside the building effort is the middle school restructuring, which will send Grades 5-6 to Herberg and Grades 7-8 to Reid. 

Phillips emphasized the need for community engagement during this time. 

"We cannot turn it around by ourselves. We need to do it in partnership and relationship with families and the community," she said.  

"We definitely are supporting family resources in our turnaround schools, but the question is, how do we embed that into the system as a value and as a priority?" 


Tags: MCAS,   Pittsfield Public Schools,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories