Dalton Board Approves Budgeting Software

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — The Select Board approved having the town manager engage in a potential contract with the budgeting software ClearGov for next fiscal year.
 
Public officials say the software will streamline and increase the transparency of the budgeting process.
 
"When I watched the presentation of this, I was totally impressed. What I like about it is the fact that it can be put up on that public website. Everybody in town can look at it," Chair Robert Bishop said. 
 
"It's very open, clear, and it's easy, even for me, to understand. So, I highly recommend we do this."
 
The total cost would be about $18,000, including the $12,000 a year subscription. The purchase had been endorsed by the Finance Committee. 
 
Town Manager Eric Anderson said he anticipates the implementation of the program to begin after the fiscal year — around July 1. 
 
The board unanimously agreed to try the software given the benefits. Select Board member Marc Strout was not present for the meeting. 
 
"I think they're going to continue with their software updates to keep us current and in place with trends," said Antonio "Tony" Pagliarulo, board member. 
 
Looking to the future, the system would be useful for new hires and improve transparency with the public, he said.
 
"I think there's a lot of positives here for the money. There's a cost benefit, but the benefit, I think, is equal to, not greater than the cost," Pagliarulo said. 
 
The information this helps disseminate will be invaluable to the residents, Select Board member John Boyle said. 
 
Board member Dan Esko expressed his concern with the high cost associated with the program. However, he acknowledged it will help organize and disseminate information, especially with some of its graphic capabilities. 
 
"So, while I understand it's not exactly going to allow us to necessarily cut any salary to pay for it. I understand that it will free up time for department managers and town manager to work on other priorities," Esko said. 
 
"So, I think the efficiencies gained there could be overall beneficial for the town. So, yeah, I'd be in support of trying this."
 
The town has been using the same Excel sheet to budget since it was developed by former committee member Terry Williams 25 years ago and life has gotten more complex since then, Anderson has said. 
 
Excel-based budgeting increases the liability to error because of the high number of cells in the document that has to be managed. 
 
The system streamlines the budgeting process for department heads and the town manager by allowing authorized personnel to input and manage their respective budgets directly, he said. 
 
This reduces time spent on manual entries and increases organizational efficiency, even if it doesn’t result in direct cost savings due to fixed salaries. 
 
ClearGov also enables the town to upload its budget to its website in an easily digestible way.
 
Budget data is displayed through graphical tools, and each section pairs clear numerical information with explanatory text from the relevant departments, allowing residents to understand both the figures and their context.
 
It also enables the import of previous years’ data for trend analysis and comparison. 
 
"I think it's also worth the adoption, because over the next couple years, we are going to have to talk seriously about whether we try for a levy limit override," Anderson said. 
 
"If we're going to even contemplate that, we need to put very clear information out to the public so they can see everything and be as transparent as possible, because if we don't do that, we don't have a shot at that. 
 
"I'm not saying it would pass anyway, but if that's something the board wants to consider, this, I think, would go a long way towards accomplishing that."
 
The initial setup fee is $5,185, which covers downloading the town's accounts, integrating it with ClearGov, and ensuring compatibility with its existing financial software.
 
This setup allows the town to pull data directly from its current system into ClearGov and, after the budget process, export it back into its financial software. 

Tags: software,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories