image description
Pittsfield is developing a 10-year master plan for its public parks and open space.

Pittsfield Seeks Input to Update Open Space, Recreation Plan

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The city wants to ensure that the community's voice is captured as it develops plans for public parks over the next decade. 

The Parks Commission saw draft goals for the Open Space and Recreation Plan to meet Pittsfield's conservation and recreation needs. Formerly a five-year plan, this new iteration will look out over 10 years.

Parks, Open Space, and Natural Resources Manager James McGrath and Seth Jenkins, senior planner at the Berkshire Regional Planning Commission, have worked over the last couple of years to update the document so the city remains eligible for state grant funding. 

"Really, we're looking just to make sure that we've gotten the ideas included," Jenkins said. 

Commissioners will vote on the draft at a later meeting, and a community input session is scheduled for Thursday, March 5, from 6 to 7:30 p.m. in City Council Chambers.

Five former goals were reduced to four, and additional action items were added, mostly related to conservation. The last approved plan ran from 2019 to 2024.

A community survey was conducted last year to help inform the guiding principles of the plan, which will represent the interests of the Parks and Recreation Department, land-use patterns, zoning concerns, and Pittsfield's developed spaces juxtaposed with the natural spaces.

McGrath explained that it asked questions like: Are we encouraging wildlife corridors and general ecosystem enhancement and improvement?

They presented the Parks Commission with draft goals and action items, which will be brought forward to the Master Plan Committee. 

These recommendations will be rolled into the Master Plan in some way, shape, or form, McGrath reported, because the Open Space Plan is like an appendix. 

"We just want to make certain that there is still a comfort level, because again, these will form the basis of kind of how we operate, so we want to make sure we're getting this right," McGrath said. 


Within the first goal to provide a sufficient amount of open space to maintain biodiversity, support habitats, and fulfill the needs of residents, three new actions were added: 

  • Investigate the creation of protected wildlife corridors to allow the movement of plant and animal species across the city;
  • Work with bordering municipalities to prioritize contiguous tracts of land for conservation;
  • Work with local nonprofits, the Conservation Commission, and state agencies, to monitor, protect and expand important habitats within the city;
  • Work with the city leadership to establish the Pittsfield lakes commission, to coordinate efforts at Pittsfield lakes, Richmond pond and Onota Lake and Pontoosuc Lake;
  • Work with nearby municipalities, including coordinating efforts of the Conservation Commissions to facilitate lake management efforts and to manage various lake users in conjunction with conservation goals.

The plan also calls on Pittsfield to consider creating a citywide composting program to redirect organic materials from the waste stream. McGrath reported that the city is exploring an initiative to develop a composting program, which would rely on the ability to obtain grant funding. 

Language was added to clarify that priority will be given to projects listed in the city's five-year capital improvement plan. 

"The previous, we had listed out a number of parks very specifically, like implementing the Springside Master Plan and undertaking an improvement project at Pontoosuc Lake Park. What we've done is we've just pointed that back to the Five-Year Capital Plan, which is sort of the city's long-range capital plan," McGrath said, explaining that it includes costly projects such as the second phase of Pontoosuc Lake Park improvements and Deming Park parking lot changes. 

He said projects like The Common and the Pittsfield Skate Plaza would not have been funded without a plan on file. 

The document also calls to implement the current Wahconah Park plan. Demolition of the current grandstand is out to bid, and the city is mulling how it can welcome community members inside one last time. 

Now on the table for the grandstand's replacement is a $15 million plan, half the cost of the original proposal. The project team is unsure if construction will begin right after the former grandstand's demolition. 

"We've had some pretty good use of the rink. I live in the same neighborhood. I drive by it often, and there generally are always folks on the rink when I go by," McGrath said. 

"This weekend, it was nice to see all the little ones playing hockey out there, and we've had figure skaters out there, kids learning how to skate. We've had grandparents with their kids. It's really been lovely, and everyone is really pleased that we were able to get this project installed, so kudos to the mayor for pushing, pushing, pushing this. I think it was a good move." 


Tags: master plan,   public parks,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories