image description
The Pittsfield City Council is supporting bills in the Legislature that would assess streaming services to supplement public cable access channels.

Pittsfield Council Backs Community Media Funding Legislation

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The City Council is backing state legislation that updates the funding model for community media, including Pittsfield Community Television, to account for declining cable revenues. 

Last week, the City Council supported House Bill H.91 and Senate Bill S.2556, "An Act to Modernize Funding for Community Media Programming." The legislation aims to support public, educational, and governmental access to media centers as more people cut the cord from cable and switch to streaming services.

Councilor at Large Peter White, who petitioned for his fellow councilors' support of the bills, thought that was "pretty easy for us to look at." State Sen. Paul Mark is one of the sponsors of the Senate bill, and state Rep. Leigh Davis is a sponsor for the House bill. 

"The state Legislature will hopefully pass a model where streaming services that use our public infrastructure would be charged a similar fee to what our cable companies negotiate with communities, because having community access television is extremely important," he explained. 

"Anyone watching us at home is doing it through what was created through that cable access fee that was charged, that we used to pay on our cable bill, however, is no longer there for anyone who's cut the cord." 

The legislation would establish a PEG Access Facilities Revenue Advisory Board that recommends an annual assessment rate for streaming services to ensure PEG access facilities maintain revenue levels, and a Streaming Entertainment Fund to collect and distribute the funds. It would apply to services with annual statewide revenues over $250,000. 

Since 2019, Pittsfield Community Television has lost more than $969,000 in inflation-adjusted revenue and has been forced to reduce staff, Executive Director Shawn Serre said. He said these bills would help replace some of those losses by "bringing the funding model up to date with viewing habits of today." 


PCTV is funded by cable franchise revenues and its own fundraising as a nonprofit organization, he explained, and in the past 40 years, the city has not spent any taxpayer money to support PCTV or provide any of its services. 

"Many more people are using streaming services today than watching cable, and with cable revenue declining, so is PCTV's funding," Serre reported. 

PCTV provides the city with coverage of city and school meetings, high school sports, candidate and election programming, special events such as the Fourth of July parade, veterans ceremonies, and thousands of hours of other programming throughout the year. It also offers facilities, training, and airtime for community-led broadcast programs. 

"It's where many people, including our high school students, have learned to produce media and go on to careers in the field," Serre said. 

"In addition to the three cable channels, we operate live streams of our programming and maintain an archive of 26,000 video programs spanning decades of city history. We also manage and operate WTBR-FM." 

White pointed out that PCTV can be streamed for free, but that takes money. 

"And if we don't want it coming from a request out of our taxes, there needs to be a funding source that replaces what used to come from the cable companies," he said. 


Tags: PCTV,   public television,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories