Dalton Considers Budgeting Software

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — The Finance Committee has endorsed a budgeting software to streamline and increase the transparency of the budgeting process.
 
The Select Board will consider whether to support the purchase of software.
 
During the Feb. 11 meeting, the committee reviewed the budgeting software ClearGov, which has been used in other municipalities and school districts, including Lanesborough, Central Berkshire Regional School District, Lenox Public Schools, and Mount Greylock Regional School District.
 
"It is an expense, but I think in terms of transparency, and about being able to give the residents of Dalton a transparent budget picture, I think it's a great way forward," Town Manager Eric Anderson said. 
 
It is something that the town can post to its website, improving transparency, and save staff time. 
 
This will be Anderson's seventh year driving a budget discussion, six in his previous town in Connecticut, and budgeting consumes a substantial number of hours annually. 
 
"I'm a pretty expensive employee for you, so anything you can do to free up my labor hours to do other things is a bonus to the town and that goes for the department heads also, and that goes for your time," Anderson said. 
 
"I think this is worth it in terms of just labor savings to the town, but I also think it's a safer way to budget." 
 
The town has been using the same Excel sheet to budget since it was developed by former committee member Terry Williams 25 years ago and life has gotten more complex since then, Anderson said. 
 
Excel-based budgeting increases the liability to error because of the high number of cells in the document that has to be managed, he said. 
 
"It's very easy to overwrite a cell and then lose the path that was previously established, and then, you know, not realize you've done that," Anderson said. 
 
Although Anderson's previous town did not approve the software, three of the four abutting towns did. 
 
"One of them adopted it after they botched a budget pretty badly through an Excel error. They set a mill rate that was roughly a million higher than they had to and ended up returning money to a town," he said. 
 
"And after that, they decided they needed to up their game on the budget issue a little bit after they took an immense amount of flack." 
 
The program is very robust, Chair William Drosehn said, referencing to a presentation on the system that he, Anderson, and Select Board Chair Robert Bishop, attended. 
 
Drosehn said he looked at a couple of other programs but did not consider them as robust. 
 
"It's really gotten my attention that it would be very beneficial for us to have this," he said. 
 
During budget deliberations, the committee often seeks up-to-date information on current fiscal year spending, but typically must wait up to a month for a response, Drosehn said. 
 
"With this piece of software, we would be able to put it on the board and know that day or that moment," he said. 
 
The initial setup fee is $5,185, which covers downloading the town's accounts, integrating it with ClearGov, and ensuring compatibility with its existing financial software.
 
This setup allows the town to pull data directly from its current system into ClearGov and, after the budget process, export it back into its financial software.
 
This year, the total cost would be about $18,000, including the $12,000 a year subscription.

Tags: accounting,   software,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories