BOSTON —Governor Maura Healey signed a new executive order to study allowing single stair construction in some residential buildings in an effort to increase housing production and lower costs.
Currently, Massachusetts building code requires two exit stairs for buildings above three stories or with long interior corridors, which makes it harder to build mid-rise development on smaller parcels. The Governor is establishing a technical advisory group to explore the possibility of allowing single stair construction in residential buildings higher than three stories to make it easier to build more housing while ensuring safety.
"We're all about making it easier to build more housing across our state to drive down costs for everyone," said Governor Healey. "While the double stair requirement plays an important role in ensuring safety, it's also holding us back from the type of housing construction we need to meet demand. This group will include the best subject matter experts and fire safety officials to explore how we can make it easier to build housing by allowing single stair construction, while continuing to protect our residents and first responders."
The advisory group, which will include fire services, building officials, national architectural experts, accessibility advocates, and public-safety professionals, will be tasked with developing a process to evaluate whether, and under what conditions, single stair multifamily residential buildings above three stories can be safely permitted in Massachusetts as a tool to expand mid-rise housing production. The group's charge will involve comparing single stair and multi-stair buildings, identifying necessary fire- and life-safety precautions, and recommending targeted updates to the State Building Code.
"Every safe, evidence-based strategy to build more homes is needed to meet the housing demands we're facing, and single-stair multifamily residential buildings could offer us a new way to increase our housing supply," said Housing and Livable Communities Secretary Ed Augustus. "This executive order will bring together the right people - from fire safety officials to architects, accessibility experts and more - who will help us explore the possibilities and find the best path forward."
Current Massachusetts building code generally requires two exit stairs for buildings above three stories or with long interior corridors, limiting the feasibility of mid-rise development on smaller parcels. With appropriate fire safety requirements, updating the code to allow the construction of single stairway residential buildings higher than three stories could significantly unlock housing production by boosting unit yield in typical mid-rise building designs, reducing per-unit construction costs and making projects on smaller lots more feasible.
Massachusetts would not be the first state to adopt a single stair standard for residential buildings higher than three stories and would be following a longstanding approach used in numerous U.S. states, as well as in many other countries. For example, New York City and Seattle have permitted single stair buildings up to six stories for decades, and Honolulu legalized them in 2012. More recently, Tennessee, Montana, and Connecticut have enacted legislation allowing single stair buildings up to six stories under specified safety conditions. Across most of Europe, double-stair requirements were never adopted.
The impact could be especially impactful because of the nature of Greater Boston's available land. Harvard's Joint Center for Housing Studies (JCHS) identified 4,955 underutilized parcels, such as parking lots or vacant, single story retail, located within ¾ mile of rapid transit that could host a mid-rise building. If these housing projects became economically feasible, JCHS estimates that these sites could produce up to 130,000 new housing units through urban infill alone if single stair is allowed up to six stories and 24 units.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.
Your Comments
iBerkshires.com welcomes critical, respectful dialogue. Name-calling, personal attacks, libel, slander or foul language is not allowed. All comments are reviewed before posting and will be deleted or edited as necessary.
No Comments
BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule
By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.
Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.
Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.
The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some.
"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.
A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.
Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.
"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."
The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.
"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.
"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also."
Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.
In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.
Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.
Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.
"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.
Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.
"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.
The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the grant conditions were properly followed.
Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.
The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal. click for more
The town election is less than a month away and, unlike recent ones, all open seats are uncontested, with even a vacancy remaining on the Planning Board.
click for more