Christian Center Surveys Needs, Proposes Changes

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Christian Center wants community feedback to fuel a potential name change and expanded programming

The nonprofit, whose origins date back to the early 1890s, has held community listening sessions at 193 Robbins Ave. and released a survey to help bring the center into 2026 and beyond.  The survey can be found online here:

English: Community Input Survey
Spanish: Encuesta de Escucha Comunitaria

Executive Director Jessica Jones reported that youth services were the theme of input received so far, community members saying, "Our kids need something to do. They need something to be connected to." 

"And we would love to be that," Jones said. 

The center dates back to the early 1890s, when it was the Epworth Mission, started by the Methodist Church to serve newly arrived immigrants and help them assimilate. The Christian Center was incorporated in 1974. 

"We know we want to make changes moving forward, and we really want to tell the community what we're thinking and why, specifically, because one of the changes we want to make is the name," Jones explained. 

"There are a lot of reasons for wanting to change the name. The biggest one is just that we feel, because the Christian Center has not provided any religious services or activities in many years, two decades, that it is excluding people unnecessarily. There are people that have this idea that the Christian Center is a church-related organization." 

The name is also a barrier to funding opportunities that exclude religious organizations. 


The survey asks what the biggest challenges facing the community are right now, what services are missing, limited, or hard to access, any barriers when trying to get help or services, and what programs The Christian Center could offer that benefit the community. 

To address gaps in services for children who are not actively involved in after-school programs, the idea at the moment is to offer low-barrier drop-in times where students can get help with homework, have a snack, and play a game.

"And eventually grow it into something a little more substantial, where we're doing some thinking about your future, exploring trades," Jones said. 

Another theme of feedback was disconnection among community members and neighbors, which they feel could be addressed with additional events and dinners that bring people together. 

The survey also lists a few name options, including the Westside Giving Center and the Pittsfield Community Center, and a blank space to write another name.  Just "The Center" has been a popular suggestion from Westside residents, who say the name should be reflective of its outreach beyond the neighborhood. 

Jones reported that they plan to do another feedback session in March with some intended action steps.  She recognized that changing the name is a big deal, having been The Christian Center since 1940, and people need to be a part of that. 

The center always appreciates donations in cash or food.


Tags: charity,   survey,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories