Dalton Finance to Discuss Budget Freeze, CBRSD Wednesday

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — The Finance Committee will be reviewing whether a budget freeze is necessary, considering ongoing financial concerns. 
 
At Monday's meeting, Select Board member Antonio Pagliarulo raised the possibility of freezing the town budget as a precautionary measure, given budget concerns presented during the last meeting. 
 
"I do think we're fine if we look at where we are in terms of budget to actuals. We seem to be tracking pretty well for [fiscal year 2026] so I have no concerns whatsoever over this year's budget," Town Manager Eric Anderson said. 
 
Last week, Anderson presented the "grim" budget to the Select Board showcasing the anticipated major drivers in the fiscal year 2027 budget. 
 
During the last meeting he explained that in the worst-case scenario, the town could be forced to reduce staff if projected increases in the school budget, health insurance, and other uncontrollable costs occur.
 
On Monday, Pagliarulo re-outlined some of the drivers that are putting pressure on the budget including the contract and planning budget, in addition to the planned sewer bill increases because of Pittsfield's sewer treatment plan upgrades.
 
The draft budget for Central Berkshire Regional School District forecast a nearly 10 percent increase. However, district administration will be presenting up-to-date numbers at the Wednesday Finance Committee meeting.  
 
It was originally projected that the average single-family tax bill was up 8.1 percent, for an increase of $449. However, last week the town received news that the FY26 bill is up 4.3 percent, a much lower number, Pagliarulo said.
 
"So, I think we can deal with this budget accordingly, especially if we look at more articles," Pagliarulo said but questioned whether the board should give Anderson the authority to freeze the budget on a case-by-case basis if he finds it necessary.
 
Pagliarulo said when Anderson presented the budget last week it felt like déjà vu from when he served on the Finance Committee 35 years ago, when the town only had $40,000. 
 
Town resources were much simpler than and fewer staff. However, the town made difficult decisions, such as trimming staff and closing town hall on Fridays. 
 
While the current financial outlook may not be as dire as it appears, Pagliarulo expressed concerns regarding free cash and the town’s accounting practices, particularly following recent staff turnover. 
 
He emphasized the need for accurate financial data and strongly advocated hiring a third-party accountant to review and update records before the new hire begins.
 
"I just want to go forward here during this budget season, knowing that our numbers are solid. If it means a third party accountant to come in and put the books in order and up to speed, and I'm not suggesting otherwise, for the new accountant, and for our purposes, I highly recommend that we get a third party coming in to do just that," Pagliarulo said. 
 
"It's worth every dollar so that we're all on the same page and know what those numbers are." 
 
Select Board member Dan Esko said he does not believe the town is at the point where it needs to freeze its budget and recommended getting input from the Finance Committee before making any decision. 

Tags: Dalton_budget,   Finance Committee,   fiscal 2027,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories