image description

Lanesborough Short-Term Rentals Moratorium Not Allowed

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — Tensions are still high over short-term rental regulations and a resolution appears to be months away. 
 
According to town counsel, the Select Board cannot impose a moratorium on short-term rental regulations, Select Board Chair Deborah Maynard said during its meeting on Monday. 
 
Maynard also read a segment from the town's website that explains the authority of the Select Board, Zoning Board of Appeals, and building commissioner, in addition to procedural information surrounding short-term rental regulations. 
 
Under state law, the commissioner is the "primary interpreter of the town's zoning by-laws for the public, builders and other town officials." 
 
"The Building Commissioner has determined that Lanesborough's bylaws do not allow the operation of short-term rentals as an accessory use from a single-family home," the announcement said. 
 
"Building Inspectors are required by law to provide notices of violations of the zoning bylaws if and as they are made known to them."
 
Additionally, the Select Board does not have the authority to overturn the building inspector, Zoning Board, or Land Court's ruling and cannot suspend zoning fines issued under state law. 
 
"Town counsel does not provide advice that would supersede a Building Commissioner's local determination," opinion said. 
 
Board members acknowledged the strained environment created by the oversight on how the short-term rental bylaw was established. 
 
At the June 2024 town meeting, voters approved new taxes and fees on short-term rentals, which are stays of less than 30 days. These include:
  • A local excise tax of up to 6 percent on total rent for each stay at bed and breakfasts, hotel lodging houses, short-term rentals, or motels
  • A 3 percent impact fee on "professionally managed" short-term rentals
  • A 3 percent impact fee on short-term rentals in two- or three-family dwellings
Although the need for regulations was mentioned during some meetings, none were promulgated, and voters were presented with options for taxing short-term rentals but not for regulating them.
 
Some residents have short-term rentals, flying under the radar, despite the town not having approved zoning regulations to ensure safety and preserve the character of the town. 
 
"The town didn't do its due diligence to come up with the zoning bylaws, and I think that the residents now are paying a price for this. I think we want to be a business-friendly town, and because of this, we're not using our discretion when it comes to this stuff," board member Jason Breault said. 
 
"At the end of the day, I think a little more discretion could have been made when it came to these decisions. Like I said, we didn't do our due diligence to come up with the bylaws. So now businesses have to pay the price." 
 
During public comment, a couple of residents spoke out in support of Second Drop Farm, urging for the repeal of its cease-and-desist for its short-term rentals and to take action to update the bylaws
 
Resident Judy Clayton said, in speaking with Planning Board member Scott Graves, who voted to dismiss the cease and desist, someone with the state confirmed a building inspector does have the right to use discretion.
 
She said, there are four "very negative consequences" to the board decision: it is causing unnecessary harm to a family; continues a narrative that Lanesborough is a difficult place to do business and that the town is managed in an inconsistent, inefficient and sometimes abrasive manner; in addition to it being very disruptive to the town. 
 
"It was not necessary to go down this path, and it isn't necessary to stay on it," Clayton said.
 
Resident Darlene Newton said short-term rentals is one of the ways agricultural entities have to diversify to have a living income. 
 
"Lanesborough needs to keep small businesses in this town, especially agriculture," she said.
 
Board member Michael Murphy said his only frustration with the situation is that the regulations, for both the sign bylaw and short-term rentals, where not adequately written by previous board members.  
 
The sign bylaw is very brief, and the regulations for short-term rentals don't exist, he said.
 
Planning Board member Leanne Yinger tried to have the board draft short-term rental regulations in 2023, but nothing happened, Murphy said.
 
"The Planning Board is now just starting to do it, to their credit," he said. More on the Planning Board's efforts here.
 
Following this, an audience member said "We want solutions. We don't want to blame people. We want solutions today."
 
"I appreciate that comment. But the reason we're being blamed today is because of some of the work that was or was not done in the past, and I'm tired of carrying that weight from people who should have made these decisions for you and for me before today," Murphy said. 
 
Following the last couple of heated Zoning Board of Appeals meetings, a couple residents also spoke out about the conduct of its chair, Mark Siegars. 
 
Paula Messana, owner of Inspired Creations gift shop on Main Street, spoke about her experience at recent ZBA meetings. 
 
She provided her perspective on what it was like speaking at the board meeting where Lanesborough Local Country Store's appeal was denied and it was determined the signage on its vintage pickup truck is a zoning violation 
 
The nearly 40-minute discussion navigated the intention of the sign bylaw and whether the display on the truck was a violation, with short bursts of yelling in between.  
 
"Siegar has created an unhealthy atmosphere and had everyone in the room on edge," Messana said. 
 
Although present, she did not speak during the intense ZBA meeting, where the board voted to uphold the building inspector's cease-and-desist order for rooms rentals at Second Drop Farm. However, she expressed her belief that Siegar dismissed the applicant's attorney several times "rudely," "unprofessionally,"  and "arrogantly."
 
Following her recount, she requested that attendees who agree with her statements stand. A few individuals rose, but it is unclear how many in the video recording. However, an applause can be heard following her comments. 
 
Rebecca Belmont echoed Messana's remarks, saying the way Siegars is conducting meetings is a reoccurring pattern of people being met with sharp, dismissive or condescending treatment. 
 
"I've also spent years in other communities and seen how local governments can build either trust or slowly erode it …This is not about a single decision. It's about his tone, his lack of respect, and whether residents feel safe coming here to participate in their own town's government," she said. 
 
The chair sets the tone for the meeting and, under basic principles of fair process and parliamentary procedure, should remain  neutral, measured and respectful, especially when residents are speaking too, Belmont said. 

Tags: short-term rentals,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories