Pittsfield Scraps Camping Ordinance for Outreach Program

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The City Council has scrapped the controversial "Camping Ordinance" and sees hope in an outreach program that connects unhoused individuals with resources. 

"It was a bad idea, please file it," Mayor Peter Marchetti said to the council on Tuesday about the ordinance that would have banned public camping and storing of personal items. 

The ordinance was sent to the Board of Health last year, and after months of consideration and a visit to the Northampton Division of Community Care, health officials recommend piloting an alternative community response program with two new homeless service coordinators who would begin work in the spring.  

"Our conclusion from that is very important. It is that street homelessness is a visible symptom of an underlying issue of deeper housing instability, complex health, and behavioral needs," Director of Public Health Andy Cambi said. 

"While enforcement was an option, enforcement alone cannot address the underlying conditions that I just mentioned. These conditions are what's contributing to the downtown experiences that were presented to you, and also what's happening in the community at large." 

The camping ordinance was filed, and the BOH's recommendations were sent to the Public Health and Safety subcommittee. 

The BOH found that homelessness is multi multifactorial, with intersections of housing instability, economic vulnerability, mental health challenges, and substance abuse. They also found that Pittsfield's current engagement response is reactive, with co-responders handling crisis calls, but there is no consistent municipal public health approach. 

The pilot will establish two dedicated community health workers in the Health Department who focus on serving unhoused individuals in the downtown and larger community. The team will coordinate closely with agencies already doing this work, Cambi said, and without duplicating it. 

Marchetti said these positions won't impact the city budget. 

Ward 6 Councilor Dina Lampiasi said she has often asked for a compassionate person to go out and interrupt a situation that may be occurring "with little imagination of what that really looks like or where that's housed," and is excited to see what comes forward. 

Councilor at Large Kathy Amuso said it has certainly been a learning experience for her, and included differing opinions at public meetings. 

"I think it's been eye-opening, and I think it's been a process that was sometimes painful, but I think with this, the Board of Health recommendations, I think have moved us to a very positive approach to helping a serious issue that we have," she said. 

Ward 7 Councilor Katherine Moody recognized the "long, strange" trip it has been since the camping ordinance was proposed. 


"I want to say, thank you. This is how it should work. You tried something, it didn't work, and now we're moving on to this holistic approach to a city-wide problem," she said. 

She hopes that it will include further outreach than downtown and into places like public parks, which she has been vocal about making sure they are "safe, health-wise, and available to our entire public." 

When it came time to file the formerly proposed ordinance, Ward 2 Councilor Cameron Cunningham expressed a wish for the current approach to have some kind of enforcement after speaking to North Street business owners in his ward's part of the downtown.  He said they want a beat cop. 

"It's a hard thing to describe and characterize, but speaking to businesses, it's almost that there's a comfort and there's a perception problem with North Street, and so what they look for is something to try to improve that," he said. 

"And I'm not up here proposing a solution, not up here proposing verbiage that would do that. I'm saying that I think there is something, that a lot of businesses feel that way. There's something to do with comfort, there's something to do with perception that needs to be solved, that is impacting their business, not just one, not just two, but it seems like my whole side of the street." 

Lampiasi said she heard the same thing from her side of North Street, and business owners feel like they need law enforcement to show up and interrupt the cycle they are seeing.  She pointed out that the public health response is interrupting these cycles before punitive responses, "because that is essentially what it ends up being." 

"The last thing that I'm going to support is putting a beat cop somewhere where we have something else to alleviate some of these issues. We don't have enough officers for the pressure that our system has right now, at least that's what we're hearing from people who need help," she said. 

"Maybe the answer is reorganizing how we're using officers and what their priorities are. I don't know, but what we have now is a need to address public health concerns, and I think the beauty of being able to have this organized, compassionate response is that we can also enforce the law." 

She, Marchetti, and other councilors pointed to laws that are not being enforced around illegal public activities.  It was also pointed out that a Pittsfield Police Department sergeant conducts outreach with unhoused individuals. 

Amuso said she has some similar concerns to Cunningham's.  She hopes that this plan, along with the units of affordable housing that have come online or will come online, will alleviate some of the issues North Street business owners bring forward. 

"We can't ignore that there are issues on North Street, and I'm hoping, Director Cambi, that you incorporate some of that into your plan, and I think again, we have to look at our data and see what this does and doesn't have." 

Marchetti said there is a two-prong approach, pointing to the open container law that was passed last year. He said the city needs to look at its laws, including loitering laws, and work with the new police chief to have officers connect with business owners and people on the streets so there is not an "us versus them" mentality. 

"So we may come back to you over the next six months with ordinance changes to assist the police with doing some of this stuff," he said, later recognizing that there is a "lot more work" that still needs to be done with city departments working together. 

On changing his perspective on the ordinance, Marchetti said he was trying to solve the problem of criminal or disruptive activities in the downtown, and that the approach evolved over time and needed the Board of Health's help. 


Tags: board of health,   camping,   homeless,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories