Lenox Facing Lawsuit Over Bullying Claims

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
LENOX, Mass. — The town is being sued by a parent over bullying allegations at Lenox Memorial Middle and High School.
 
A lawsuit filed Feb. 2 in U.S. District Court outlines why Matthew Lenehan claims he had to withdraw his daughter from the school because of ongoing bullying by another student, as well as the school nurse and a soccer coach.
 
Leneham demands a trial by jury on three counts of negligence, negligent infliction of emotional distress, and violation of the 14th Amendment (equal protection), in addition to one count against then Principal Jeremiah Ames, also for violation of the 14th Amendment.
 
Ames was recently promoted to assistant superintendent of finance and operations.
 
The 60-page document asserts that the district failed to retrain staff on the proper procedures and policies to address bullying following a 2022 investigation by the district's own law firm, Murphy, Hesse, Tommey, and Lehane LLP, that showed instances of mishandling of bullying reports. 
 
The investigation, prompted by a parent's complaint, reviewed five formal bullying complaints, four informal complaints, and seven staff-to-student bullying complaints. 
 
The findings revealed multiple failures, including inadequate investigations, insufficient documentation of findings and outcomes, failure to notify involved parties, and mishandling of the complaint process, and no clear formal mechanism to report staff-to-student bullying concerns. 
 
The district now has a document outlining the steps in reporting and investigating bullying in its schools.
 
Jeremiah Ames was hired as interim principal in January 2023 and was officially hired in April that same year, as was Superintendent William Collins. The lawsuit indicates both were aware of the audit's findings. 
 
The suit states that the Collins and Ames administration's primary goal was to combat bullying "by providing clear expectations and consistent responses to inappropriate and harmful behaviors." 
 
Despite these claims, the cycle of bullying continued, the lawsuit states, and the soccer coach was not given proper training on the district's bullying policies. 
 
The lawsuit claims the coach and another student with a history of "abusive behavior" targeted Lenehan's daughter with around three months of public chastising, name-calling from peers, and rumor spreading, among other complaints, said to cause the student emotional distress.
 
There was also an alleged threat on Snapchat by the other student to bring a gun to school to shoot his daughter, according to the lawsuit. 
 
A student was removed from Lenox High in September 2024 for a Snapchat threat, which was categorized as "something stupid they thought was funny." 
 
After repeated attempts to resolve the situation and claims of being dismissed by the administration, Lenehan said he enrolled his daughter in a district in the eastern part of the state, requiring him to rent two houses so she could attend a new district and placing additional strain on the family, as the mother had to remain in the Berkshires. 
 
Lenehan is being represented by attorney Laura Mangini of Alekman DiTusa LLC. The school district has not yet responded to the complaint.

 


Tags: lawsuit,   Lenox Memorial,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories