image description

Lenox Looks to Add Parking with Street Changes

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
LENOX, Mass. — The Select Board is moving forward with a proposal to increase parking on two downtown streets by making them one-way.
 
On Wednesday night, Department of Public Works Superintendent William "Billy" Gop showed a proposal of Church and Franklin Streets that would add 26 new parking spots and change them to both streets to one-ways. 
 
The proposal comes after the town was looking for a way to add more parking after losing a major parking lot last year.
 
"We had a lot of chatter over the past year about purchasing two parcels in the downtown core, and the presumption was that the town wanted to at least use one of them in order to allow for protection of the parking that we have on the dirt lot," said Town Manager Jay Green. "The dirt lot has been privately owned. It was through the graciousness of the Schultz family that allowed the town to use it as essentially municipal parking lot over the years."
 
The parking lot at 41 Housatonic St. would have cost about $1 million but a private buyer swooped in, which meant a total loss of around 20 downtown spots. 
 
"At this point, the town is out of that business looking at those parcels, as we all know, but the conversation that it started last year was essentially, what can we do to at least protect and replicate the same number of spots that we have in the dirt lot without buying property, taking it off the tax rolls, and do so in a cost-effective manner," Green said.
 
The new concept shows Church Street and Franklin Street operating as a one-way which will add more parking spots on each side The plan was questioned whether snowplows would be affected with how narrow it would become.
 
Gop said it is a worry but that it would not be hard to enforce a ban of one side during the winter. 
 
"We can change it, we can do anything. This was the idea here was to get an idea of what would happen if we did, how many parking spots we would get additionally if we did," he said. 
 
"And then we can just see what issues we have, and if we don't like it, we go scrap it, but we wanted to tweak it, and maybe in the winter months, it's no parking this side."
 
Green and Gop said they would like to see how these new spots would work for two years and that it would be easy to go back or tweak it. 
 
"The way that Bill and I would like to do this is really a two-year pilot, so we can test these concepts, particularly during the winter. We haven't really thought through that, so that was some great feedback. If it doesn't work, it's not a problem, you can go back," Green said.
 
Gop explained this would only change part of Church Street after the intersection with Housatonic.
 
"The only major change will be off of Main Street coming up to Franklin. Or if you're leaving Tucker street, you won't be able to come up Church," he said. "You'll have to take a right and go out."
 
The board was agreeable to the plan but thought there might need to be more enforcement on parking from the Police Department.
 
"This is really the cost is negligible, and it's painting, striping, signage, but the follow on things such as enforcement and being proactive and informative will be important," said Select Board member Neal Maxymillian. "So that'll be staff cost, but I mean, this is, to me, something that certainly we should go to the next step." 
 
The board voted to hold a public hearing. The change could go into effect by spring. 

Tags: parking,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories