Pittsfield Council Again Requests Redacted PHS Report

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The City Council has again asked the School Committee for a redacted version of the 2025 Pittsfield High School investigative report. 

This time, it is sent to an almost-all-new panel that largely expressed a need for increased transparency around the report during last year's election.  

On Tuesday, Ward 6 Councilor Dina Lampiasi and Ward 7 Councilor Katherine Moody's petition urging the School Committee release the report with needed redactions was approved. School Committee member Ciara Batory has submitted the same request for Wednesday's meeting. 

Five past and present PHS staff members were investigated for alleged misconduct, and allegations were found to be "unsupported," according to executive summaries released by the former committee. 

Moody said the handling of this report has caused "such massive damage" to public trust. 

"I would argue that the damage done to our community by handling this so poorly far outweighs the possibility of lawsuits on a very carefully and well-redacted report that needs to be released to the public," she added. 

"I've been shouting this from the rooftop for far too long, and now I finally have a podium to shout from. So there you go, release the report." 

The district launched a more than $150,000 investigation at the end of 2024 after a Pittsfield High dean of students, Lavante Wiggins, was arrested and charged by the U.S. Attorney's Office for allegedly conspiring to traffic large quantities of cocaine in Western Massachusetts.

Allegations of staff misconduct soon surfaced on social media, and three PHS administrators and two teachers, past and present, were investigated by Bulkley Richardson and Gelinas LLP at the request of the School Committee. 

The public was provided information on the case through five executive summaries that largely found the allegations unsupported. The final executive summary released in May was unable to conclude that an administrator shared a nude image with students on social media. 

Both Superintendent Joseph Curtis and PHS Principal Maggie Harrington-Esko retired at the end of the school year; Wiggins' case is currently in U.S. District Court.   

In April 2025, the council urged the School Committee to release a public summary of the findings from the independent investigation. Ward 1 Councilor Kenneth Warren also submitted an administrative appeal to the state office of public records, and Supervisor of Records Manza Arthur determined that the Pittsfield Public Schools met their burden to withhold public records

The week before, school officials requested a recap of the process and, if possible, the findings of the investigation. 

Lampiasi explained that this is to follow up with a new group of people, saying, "Hey, let's do the right thing. Let's correct our narrative here in Pittsfield and try to not look like we support hiding things." Part of the issue, she said, was a lack of communication from the previous School Committee and district administration. 

"All of us here know, and everybody at home knows, that Pittsfield has a real image problem. We have an image problem. Families in our city do not feel comfortable. They want to know more information. Families in the schools want more information. Surrounding communities are not choosing Pittsfield because they want more information," she said. 



"Not only that, but they want to see what we're doing differently. What we can do differently is to be more honest and to speak up when we need to get more information. It's that simple." 

Warren said there is no confusion in the public's vote this last election, and addressed "red herrings" raised by previous School Committee members. 

"One, they say that the investigation was for potential disciplinary reasons, but it wasn't. It really wasn't. All the significant instances that had been investigated had been investigated previously, and they were found without merit. And if they would have told us that, or told the public that, there might have been some difference of what was necessary. The investigation was the result of public pressure for transparency, not for discipline," he said. 

"No. 2, they say too much transparency could hinder future investigations, if only there was something that might guide us in determining this…" 

He pointed out that Miss Hall's School released its investigative report after several former students came forward in early 2024, reporting that a teacher (Matthew Rutledge, 62 at the time) had abused and exploited them at the private school. 

Councilor at Large Peter White suggested that an amendment be made to redact the names of non-investigated employee participants, and the petition was further amended to allow the School Committee to set a date for the redacted report's release, rather than Feb. 18. 

Other proposed redactions include at a minimum: 

  • The names and any personally identifying information of any student, minor, or former
    student
  • The names and any personally identifying information of any non-employee participant,
    including but not limited to parents/guardians, volunteers, witnesses, complainants, or
    community members who are not employed by Pittsfield Public Schools
  • Any information that would reasonably identify a student or non-employee participant
    through context (including unique identifiers, specific dates, or highly specific descriptions)
  • Any information that is legally protected, including information covered by student privacy
    requirements and personnel confidentiality where required by law

Councilor at Large Kathleen Amuso explained that she voted for the petition last year, and cited concerns about overloading the School Committee with another task on top of the middle school restructuring and a tight budget year coming up. 

She and Ward 3 Councilor Matthew Wrinn voted against the petition, Amuso explaining that she has already supported this and will support what is on the School Committee agenda. 

Wrinn does not want to wait any longer to release the report. 

"We've wasted far too much time on this, far too much money," he said. 

"There are victims that are listed in this report that are going to be redacted that the general public is going to know who they are. We've embarrassed ourselves enough. We've elected a new School Committee. Let's be transparent going forward and put this behind us." 


Tags: investigation,   PHS,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories