Dalton Prepares for Challenging Budget Season

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — As the town embarks on a challenging budget season, the new town manager has already put forth cost mitigation options. 
 
It has been demonstrated by both the Finance Committee and Town Manager Eric Anderson that this budget season will be full of obstacles and tough decisions. 
 
During the Select Board meeting on Monday night, Anderson explained that the town is going to be very close to its levy limit with the increases in the school district budget, health-care costs, and cost-of-living increase for employees.
 
Health insurance costs are projected to increase roughly 16 to 18 percent for next year, which will be a "big hit" to the town, he said. 
 
The town currently pays about $1.2 million total for employee health insurance. Employees are responsible for around 27 percent of the health-care costs, Anderson said. 
 
The board approved setting the cost of living adjustment for town employees to 3 percent for fiscal year 2027. 
 
The board felt that the 2 percent COLA combined with the 1.75 percent step or grade increase was in line with the consumer price index of about 2.7 percent. 
 
"I think the budget is going to be a challenging one this year. I don't want to put undue strain on it, but I also realize the challenges that our employees certainly face with cost of living and inflation," Esko said. 
 
Additionally, the board approved setting the Step 1 Grade A to match the state minimum wage of $15 an hour. Prior to the vote, it was $14.91 but the town does not have any staff at this level. 
 
To align with the state, the board felt it necessary to make this change. 
 
The board also approved changes to the fee structure for the building department and Zoning Board of Appeals permit applications, as recommended by Anderson, in an effort to make the department self-sustaining and recoup staff time and administrative costs. 
 
"As part of my review of the budget, I look at two aspects — one is what our actual expenses are, and the second thing is what revenue sources we have," he said.
 
The building department has been running at a deficit of about $10,000 after all the fees have been taken in for the year to offset the department's budget. 
 
The minimum building permit fee was changed from $50 to $60 and the evaluation of work costs were increased from $5 per $1,000 to $6 per $1,000. 
 
The town has not been taking in any portion of the plumbing, gas, and electrical permits because applicants use the online permit program that the building department budget pays for. 
 
The fees taken from fees taken from those permits are given to the inspectors as they are paid as subcontractors. 
 
There will be an additional $10 charge per permit, which will go back to the town to cover the cost of the permit program. 
 
The Zoning Board of Appeals permit fee structure was changed to accurately reflect the costs of processing each applicant and to generate revenue for the town. 
 
Rather than sending abutter notification via certified mail, the town will now be sending it through certified mailing list, with prepaid postage, which is substantially cheaper, Anderson said. 
 
The way certified mailing list works is the post office certifies the list of addresses the mail is being sent to, he said. 
 
"The post office is acknowledging that everything on your list was sent, which is essentially what you're trying to do … I think actually, we'll get them in the hands of more people," Anderson said. 
 
The problem with certified mail is a lot of people refuse to accept it, believing it contains bad news, he said. 
 
"So, what happens is, usually three weeks after we do a mailing, we get 15 or 20 percent of the letters we spend out paying $10 bucks a piece to get returned to us as undeliverable," Anderson said. 
 
"So essentially, we would be increasing the application fees on our labor, but then doing something that decreases the mailing costs for these so it's not going to cost the applicant that much more, but we as a town, net more money," he said. 
 
The fee structure for the zoning board of appeal were also changed as follows: 
  • Board of Assessors Certified Abutters List: from $25 to $35. 
  • Berkshire Eagle Legal Posting (2 required): from a total of $264.80 to $323.16 
  • Certified Abutters Letters: from $8.69 each to $10.44 each
  • Minimum Legally Required Notifications to Applicant and Abutting Towns (8 required): from a total of $69.52 to $83.52
These changes equate the total cost of a Zoning Board of Appeals permit to $441.85 plus $10.44 per the number of abutter letters. 
 
Anderson is also discussing with the Board of Health increasing some of the boards fees to recapture costs and also to potentially encourage businesses to renew their permits on time. 
 
"We're spending a lot of time chasing them down," Anderson said. 
 
The town's health agent, through Berkshire Regional Planning Commission, demonstrated how other towns have fees for late renewals. 
 
"The Board of Health has the ability to do it. So, I would suggest we do that. We're not talking about large fines," he said. 
 
The town could charge about $25 to recoup its labor for the time it takes to chase the businesses down.  

Tags: Dalton_budget,   fiscal 2027,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories