image description
The Wahconah grandstand is set to come down this spring to make way for a "less is more" replacement.

Wahconah Park Grandstand Cost Halved to $15M

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The price tag for Wahconah Park's new grandstand has been cut in half, and planners are looking at a "less is more" approach that is sustainable for the future. 

In 2023, the park's restoration committee recommended a $30.2 million overhaul of the historic grandstand that was condemned the previous year. Now, the city is considering an approximately $15 million, smaller design within the same footprint, along with a staged approach that allows baseball to be played before the project is complete. 

"There's some real, practical changes that we're making, which we think will still meet the spirit and intent of what we're trying to do but also recognizing that, hey, you know, we've got to maintain this thing into the future, and it's got to be designed and constructed in such a way that we can do that," 
Parks, Open Space, and Natural Resources Manager James McGrath said. 

The Historical Commission OKed the demolition of the grandstand on Monday. The plan is to demolish it  in April and immediately make provisions to allow baseball on-site. The Pittsfield Suns will be back at the park this season after a two-year hiatus because of the grandstand. 

There is no guarantee that the new grandstand will start to materialize in 2026, but the team is working swiftly to meet timelines. 

McGrath described the 2023 proposal as an "all-in" design that met the robust needs of baseball players and the wider city. With some scaling down, material changes, and alterations to seating, it was shaved down to half of the original cost estimate. 

A fair portion of the overall cost relates to site work, as the floodplain property is prone to flooding. The original civil engineer was not performing to expectations, and SK Design was brought in to take over the job. 

Mayor Peter Marchetti ordered the team to scale back the building and take a "less is more" kind of approach, McGrath reported. 

The new design works in the same footprint as the original grandstand, utilizing the existing pine piers that were set into the ground in the 1940s for structural integrity. Spectators will have a similar experience once the building is complete, with a mix of fixed seats and benches on either side of the central entryway, which will be replicated in the new design. 

The property is on the National Register of Historic Places, and a memorandum of agreement between the Massachusetts Historical Commission stipulates that the city must photograph the original grandstand and include a historical display in the new building. 

There will be a similar roof structure, though a little more compact, and it will meet all modern ADA and building codes. 


"Currently, that grandstand meets none of it," McGrath said. 

"And in fact, there are hazardous materials literally dripping from the ceilings and dripping down the walls. A significant portion of what we are allocating toward demolition is hazardous material remediation on site." 

All of the electrical services will have to be extracted from the site, and highlights will be placed off to the side. The city will construct a backstop with poles and fencing or netting around the field to protect onlookers before the grandstand is built. Assurance was given that the city is dedicated to replacing the grandstand. 

"It'll be an odd view. I think that the first time you walk toward the park and see the grandstand gone, it's going to be singularly weird. I'm not going to lie," McGrath said. 

On Jan. 20, the Parks Commission will see an update from S3 Design and the owner's project manager, Skanska, including a description of site preparation work after the grandstand is demolished and a look into the new design. 

While not all of the financing is in place for the project, it was allocated $3 million through Congressman Richard Neal's office, and "the mayor believes that he can raise and appropriate a certain amount of capital funds to meet what invariably will be approximately a $15 million project," McGrath said. 

He added that Pittsfield's history with baseball is to be celebrated, and he sees the city ready to fund a new grandstand more modestly. 

"This city deserves a grandstand at that location," he said. 

"It's not only about baseball, it's a community gathering space. Baseball really has kind of been the central theme, but at the end of the day, Wahconah Park is also a spirit that we carry as a community."

The civil engineer is working hard to find the best solution for on-site flooding. Because of the park's location, it will always flood to some extent, McGrath said, but the goal is to make sure that it floods in a designated area and doesn't leave a mess afterwards. 

In December, the Parks Commission accepted a negotiating rights agreement between the city and longtime summer collegiate baseball team, the Pittsfield Suns. It solidifies that the two will work together when the historic ballpark is renovated. 


Tags: Wahconah Park,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories