Lanesborough Farm Appealing Short-Term Rental Prohibition

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
LANESBOROUGH, Mass. —  Are short-term rentals permitted in Lanesborough? 
 
That question has sparked debate following a cease-and-desist sent to Second Drop Farm, the new keepers of the historic Bradley Farm, for using its farmhouse as on Airbnb. 
 
The farm's owners have appealed to the Zoning Board of Appeals, which is holding a public hearing  at 6 p.m. on Wednesday at Town Hall
 
The Airbnb is an important part of the farm's services, especially in the winter season, because it helps keep the farm sustainable, said Samantha Phillips, one of the farm's owners. 
 
"We're not growing anything other than raising chickens for eggs in the winter. It's a vital part of our income to have the Airbnbs here on the farm," she said. 
 
Prior to opening the short-term rental, Phillips said they complied with several safety regulations by having the fire inspector visit the property and installing a "state-of-the-art fire/security system."
 
They also made sure their operation was listed on the state website for short-term rentals to ensure it is properly taxed. 
 
At the June 2024 town meeting, voters approved new taxes and fees on short-term rentals, which are stays of less than 30 days. These include:
  • A local excise tax of up to 6 percent on total rent for each stay at bed and breakfasts, hotel lodging houses, short-term rentals, or motels
  • A 3 percent impact fee on "professionally managed" short-term rentals
  • A 3 percent impact fee on short-term rentals in two- or three-family dwellings
"That's like, the huge issue right now is that, how can a town take money for a business that they're stating is not allowed," Phillips questioned. 
 
Discussions surrounding short-term rentals were held during public meetings leading up to the annual town meeting, including the Select Board and Public Safety Building Committee. 
 
In August 2023, the existence of Airbnbs was acknowledged during a discussion on signage for the town's public beach, restricting it to residents only. 
 
The topic was discussed during several Public Safety Building Committee meetings in 2023, with the hope that funds collected from the tax, paid by the travelers, to cover municipal capital projects, such as the proposed police facility. 
 
Although the need for regulations was mentioned during some meetings, none were promulgated, and voters were presented with options for taxing short-term rentals but not for regulating them.
 
According to the Building Commissioner Brian Duval, third-party booking operations such as Airbnb and Vrbo are becoming popular these days, with many towns in similar situations. 
 
"There are some cities and towns that have adopted bylaw language to address this use, but many have not. The Town of Lanesborough's Planning Board will be actively working on crafting language to add this use to its bylaws," he said. 
 
"The proposed by-law amendment will have to be approved at a town meeting, then reviewed and approved by the [Attorney General's] office before it will become effective. 
 
"Once this is in place, there are state Building Code requirements that must be met as well as maintaining a valid Certificate of Inspection involving annual inspections to be made by the Health, Fire, and Building departments."
 
In addition to taxing short-term rentals, the town's bylaws do regulations surrounding parking requirements. 
 
"There's so many mixed messages that are being sent, [it] looks to me like we are allowing it, just by the fact of it's in the zoning bylaws as such. If it was absolutely not being allowed, then I wouldn't expect that we would go to the trouble of defining it, talking about how many parking places and collecting community impact fees and taxes," Barbara Davis Hassan, local Realtor, said during the Select Board meeting on Monday. 
 
"I would think it would almost make sense in the interim, I mean, they're going to do their ZBA hearing, and that's all fair and good, because the process allows it, but it would almost seem like it would make more sense for the building inspector to put on hold any further cease-and-desist notices until such time as the Planning Board and the building inspector get together.
 
"I would think the building inspector should go to the Planning Board meeting as a guest so that he could know that this is what we're doing in order to answer the questions about whether these are allowed or not."
 
This is not the first time Second Drop Farm has been flagged by the building inspector since opening in 2022, leading the owners to believe they are being targeted. 
 
Phillips demonstrated how last year the building inspector informed them that they needed to hire an architect to operate its farm store or the coffee shop because it wasn't zoned for such usage. However, the farm's previous owners used the space to sell baked goods and had a farm store. 
 
"At the time, we were just trying not to ruffle anyone's feathers. So we hired an architect, and it was a lot of money," she said. 
 
"We even hired professional contractors who came in and said, 'No, you guys don't need special permits. You don't need anything but if this is what the town is going to require you guys to do to open, then you just need to do it.'"

Tags: ZBA,   short-term rentals,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories