Central Berkshire Approves Competency Evaluation Plan

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — The state is mandating that school districts develop a competency evaluation plan now that the 10th grade MCAS scores are no longer a graduation requirement. 
 
 
The competency test has been in the schools for more than 30 years, a result of the state's 1993 Education Reform Act.
 
With its passage, the question remains on how schools will prove graduates are meeting competency standards. 
 
"The state started to put out some new guidelines and expectations for high schools. High schools now have to demonstrate that their students have achieved competency," said Aaron Robb, assistant superintendent. 
 
Districts were "essentially told" to come up with their own plans to provide evidence of that template provided by the state. 
 
In December, the School Committee approved the district's competency determination plan, which was adjusted to meet guidelines submitted by the state. 
 
"We got a head start on it here in Central Berkshire. The snow was still on the ground. It was like February. We started working on this a while ago and we were way out ahead of it," Robb said. 
 
"However, the guidance that we were getting from the state was minimal. The most substantive guidance we got from the state wasn't until July." 
 
The individuals who were working on it were on summer vacation by the time the district received guidance. 
 
"So, when we reconvened as a team, when school started back up, we had to do some revisions based upon the new guidance that we received. Then we were told we were going to be getting some more guidance," Robb said. 
 
"Later on in the fall, in the midst of us actually finishing up this plan, is when the governor's new proposal for high school graduation requirements was made public." 
 
The district's Competency Determination Policy specifies graduation requirements, such as credits earned, how competency is assessed for all students — including those with disabilities, English learners, and late enrollees — and outlines appeal procedures and the process for former students to request diplomas.
 
During the district's process of developing its plan it had to try and anticipate the state guidelines.
 
"A lot of this plan is a reiteration of what we already do but there were also some expectations that we had to live up to or guidelines we had to work within once we finally received the guidance from the state," Robb said. 
 
Initially, the district was under the impression that high stakes assessments like midterms and final exams were going to be heavily scrutinized by the state. 
 
So, the district put forth a plan where students had to pass those in order to achieve competency.
 
"What we're now hearing from the governor's plan is that they have something called 'end-of-year course assessments' built into their plan, but they don't want the … assessments to be a hurdle or an obstacle for students on their path to graduation," Robb said. 
 
"They want them to mean something, but they don't want them to be preventative in terms of a student graduating. So, what we're trying to do is we're trying to adjust our sales a little bit and take our lead a little bit from that hint from the governor in our plan."

Tags: CBRSD,   MCAS,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories