Hunger in the Berkshires Does Not Take a Holiday

By Deborah LeonczykGuest Column
Print Story | Email Story
When the holidays end and life settles back into its familiar routines, the surge of generosity that defines November and December inevitably begins to fade. The food drives quiet down, the festive meals are over, and the community's attention shifts to the next challenge. 
 
Yet for thousands of our Berkshire neighbors, hunger remains exactly where it was before the holidays began. It does not ease with the passing of a season. It does not follow the calendar. It lingers quietly at kitchen tables long after the decorations have been packed away.
 
Hunger in the Berkshires affects working parents stretching every paycheck, older adults deciding between groceries and prescriptions, and children who depend on school meals through the long winter months. For many families, hunger is not a temporary crisis but a constant strain that often intensifies once the holidays are behind us.
 
The Numbers Behind the Need
According to the Food Bank of Western Massachusetts, an average of 25,324 Berkshire residents sought food assistance each month last year through one of the county's 39 local food pantries or meal sites. A statewide study by the Greater Boston Food Bank found that 39 percent of Berkshire residents are food insecure compared with 33 percent statewide. These numbers do not shrink after the holidays. In fact, winter expenses often push many families from "barely managing" into "needing help now."
 
Behind each number is a person doing everything possible to get by. A parent skipping dinner so a child can eat. A senior making a single bag of groceries last the week. Hard-working families who simply earn too little to keep pace with the rising cost of living in our region.
 
A Network of Hope
Fortunately, Berkshire County is home to an extraordinary network of food providers that operates with unwavering compassion throughout the year. Across the county, 21 food pantries, six meal sites, eight senior "brown bag" locations, and four Mobile Food Bank sites extend care and dignity to thousands of residents.
 
The Pittsfield Community Food Pantry serves more than 6,700 people each month through open pantry hours, grab-and-go breakfasts, prepared dinners, and home deliveries to 500 families weekly. In North Adams, the Berkshire Food Project serves hot meals five days a week to nearly 2,300 people, and the Friendship Center Food Pantry welcomes close to 1,000 residents every month. The Lee Food Pantry and the Berkshire Dream Center's mobile pantry ensure that families in smaller or more rural towns are not left behind.
 
At BCAC, our Food Depot coordinates weekly deliveries from the Food Bank of Western Massachusetts to pantries countywide. With transportation donated by Big Y, food reaches every corner of the county. Goodwill of the Berkshires and Southern Vermont also sends trucks of fresh groceries to some of the most remote areas. Together, these programs provide more than 2.6 million meals each year, yet the need continues to grow during the winter months when budgets are stretched the furthest.
 
The Economics of Hunger
The roots of hunger here lie in both economics and geography. The median household income in Berkshire County is about $72,500, compared with more than $104,000 statewide.
 
While housing costs may be higher in eastern Massachusetts, the income gap leaves Berkshire families with far less margin to absorb rising prices for groceries, heat, and transportation. The county's poverty rate of 12 percent is higher than the state average of 10 percent, and nearly one in six Berkshire children lives in a household struggling to get by.
 
But poverty and food insecurity are not the same. While about 12 percent of residents live below the poverty line, tens of thousands more hover just above it. They earn too much to qualify for assistance, yet too little to stay food secure. These are the families most vulnerable once holiday generosity subsides.
 
The SNAP Connection
The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program remains the most effective safeguard against hunger. Yet when temporary federal increases expired in 2023, households across Massachusetts lost about $151 a month on average.
 
For many Berkshire families, that reduction pushed them toward local food pantries for the first time. And after Congress passed a reconciliation budget expected to remove 150,000 Massachusetts residents from SNAP, the strain on local food programs is expected to intensify in the year ahead.
 
Carrying Compassion Forward
The holidays inspire generosity, but the real test of a community's compassion comes in the quieter months that follow. Hunger is with us all year long. The question is whether our commitment will last just as long.
 
Here is how you can help in the months ahead:
  • Advocate for strong federal investments in SNAP and oppose reductions to benefits.
  • Volunteer during the winter months when volunteer numbers drop sharply.
  • Donate food, funds, or grocery cards on a monthly basis to help pantries remain stocked after holiday giving declines.
The Berkshires has always been a place where people look out for one another. That spirit is our strength. As we move into a new year, let us carry forward the compassion we show during the holidays and work toward a future where no one in the Berkshires goes hungry.
 
Deborah Leonczyk is executive director Berkshire Community Action Council.

Tags: BCAC,   food insecurity,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories