Central Berkshire Navigating AI in Education

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — The Central Berkshire Regional School District is researching artificial intelligence in education to inform future policy and practice.
 
"Our ultimate goal is to at least to have some common expectations that we can rally around first," Assistant Superintendent Aaron Robb said at December's School Committee meeting. 
 
In September, Robb established an AI ad hoc committee made up of teachers, a student, the IT director, and a School Committee member. The committee has been trying to meet twice a month, he said. 
 
It is charged with researching the challenges and opportunities AI presents in education to help the district navigate the "AI revolution."
 
Throughout the process, the committee will get guidance from Fadia Rostom-Makdisi, computer  scientist, AI educational adviser, and former principal of St. Agnes' School. 
 
"She's gone off on her own as a consultant and she's doing some consulting work with schools around AI and she's been doing some, as we've just been calling it, 'AI 101' training in our district," Robb said. 
 
During the November professional development days, almost 100 district staff and faculty received a three-hour basic AI training from Rostom-Makdisi which covered the how and what of AI and several commonly used AI tools in education. 
 
The hope is to gather information so that the district can talk about it more intelligently before debating it, Robb said. 
 
At the initial AI ad hoc committee meeting, members expressed the concerns and possible opportunities AI presents while using resources from the state department Department of Elementary and Secondary Education to inform the discussion. 
 
"We're in the middle of the AI ocean right now and we're keeping a very close eye on the guidance that DESE is putting out," Robb said. 
 
"DESI is putting out some really strong and clear guidance about AI that we are finding useful as a committee." 
 
Technology Director Joseph Stergis has gathered a list of tools for educators that he has researched, and their data privacy agreement to ensure that if the district is using AI in any area, that the data sharing is safe.
 
"As we teach educators about AI, they're also going to want to experiment with it," Superintendent Michael Henault said. 
 
During a recent presentation with the former DESE commissioner, Jeff Riley, who has been working with a group from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology on AI use in education, it was recommended to start setting practical applications and putting guardrails for teachers and students at the handbook level due to the quick evolution of the subject, Henault said. 
 
"That group recommended to actually not do School Committee policy first and to stay away from it because any policy we put in place is likely to change … very quickly," he said
 
It was recommended to start at the handbook level, he continued, then "work backwards towards policy once we have our heads around where this is going to go because nobody really knows."
 
To support more focused work, the ad hoc committee established two subcommittees: the Policy, Safety, and Ethics subcommittee and Teaching, Learning, and Staff Training subcommittee. Both subcommittees have been tasked with creating draft priorities and considerations to be reviewed by the full AI ad hoc committee, according to the November report.
 
The Policy, Safety, and Ethics subcommittee is developing priorities for an initial district AI policy framework, Henault said in his November update.
 
The subcommittee will review topics required for safe and responsible AI use including data privacy, transparency, academic integrity, bias mitigation, and the ethical guardrails. 
 
The Teaching, Learning, and Staff Training subcommittee will explore how AI can support instructional innovation, personalized learning, curriculum development, and staff professional growth. The group will also identify training, resources, and curriculum adjustments required for effective integration of AI tools into classroom practice. 
 
"The goal is to ultimately present a set of actionable recommendations to district leadership this spring. The committee is committed to ensuring that any future use of AI in the district is safe, equitable, transparent, and aligned with our educational mission and values," the report says. 
 
There was a strong interest in joining the committee from staff. However the number of members was limited to 15 so an additional AI Advisory Group was created consisting of interested staff members. 
 
"There were people that wanted to be part of it, but I couldn't put together a committee of 35 people," Robb said. "So, I created an AI advisory group that's going to meet less frequently and less formally." 
 
The advisory group will meet with Robb every month for the remainder of the school year. 
 
"We are pleased to be able to include this group in an effort to bring as many voices into this work as possible," he said in the report. 
 
The goal of the group is to provide feedback to the ideas generated by the ad-hoc committee, pilot strategies for their own schools or classrooms, and share their experiences with AI. 
 
Additionally, it will act as a communication bridge by sharing updates with colleagues and bringing questions or concerns back to the AI Ad Hoc committee.
 
"The AI advisory committee is going to be more of our boots on the ground kind of more informal group," Robb said. 
 
"I'm going to take what the AI ad hoc committee is doing and report out to those folks for feedback and we're going to start a feedback loop with them." 

Tags: artificial intelligence,   CBRSD,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories