image description
The Historical Commission has continued again a request by the city to raze 86 John St., former home of local faith leader Fannie Cooper.

Pittsfield Commission OKs Demo of Multifamilies

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

The city was hoping to have this blighted house on Fourth Street demolished by year's end. 

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Disrepaired houses at 154 Francis Ave. and 224 Fourth St. will be demolished as part of the city's yearly efforts to address condemned properties. 

The Historical Commission earlier this month OK'd the demolition of the two multifamily homes built in the 1800s, and continued the decision to raze the former home of Fannie Cooper, Price Memorial A.M.E Zion Church's founder. 

"If we can pause and see the inside to see if it's really too far gone, but also to let people be a little more aware that it belonged to a legend," Chair John Dickson said about the John Street home. 

"Perhaps in a month's time or at the next meeting, we'll be ready to move forward." 

The Francis Avenue property, built in 1863, has a compromised roof, making it difficult to rehabilitate and vulnerable to the elements. Heirs have not maintained the property, and it has seen code enforcement actions from the city since 2018, now marked with an ‘X' because it is unsafe to enter. 

The Fourth Street home, built in 1893, is in a similar situation. 

Community Development & Housing Program Manager Nate Joyner said the city would like the John Street and Fourth Street properties demolished this year, and the other in 2026. 


The commissioners didn't act on a request to demolish 86 John St., built in 1893, because they wanted more information on the home that once belonged to the prominent local faith leader. Cooper founded the Price Memorial on Linden Street and was the sister of Dorothy Amos, for whom the West Street park is named. 

The property, held in Cooper's estate, has been vacant since 2018 but has been monitored by the city for code enforcement since 2008. It is believed to have begun falling into disrepair around 2013. 

"And then in 2018 it was left vacant, and it's just been in deteriorating condition since then," Joyner reported. 

The taxes are too advanced to be put forward for receivership, he said, and the property has been accruing penalties and interest for nonpayment of taxes since 2020. Receivership is a legal process where a court-appointed, neutral third party takes control and management of a residential property, and Pittsfield tries to identify two or three properties for this process each year. 

Joyner recommended that commissioners not enter the property because of its unsanitary condition and other concerns, like mold.  

The city is tracking around 80 vacant residential buildings. Reportedly, many heirs see shuttered properties as a cost burden and don't have the resources for needed repairs.  

The city can respond with a tax title, when the local government places a lien on the property to secure the tax debt, or a lengthy tax title taking in land court. Buildable vacant land is made available to Central Berkshire Habitat for Humanity or the West Side Legends for affordable housing. 


Tags: blight,   demolition,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories