image description
The William Russell Allen House has sat empty for 50 years after it was purchased by the state along with St. Luke's Hospital and Madonna Hall from the Catholic Diocese of Springfield. A plan to turn it into offices never took off.

William Russell Allen House Study Near Complete

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — A feasibility study on the William Russell Allen House is expected by the end of the month.

What comes after that is unclear, but local historians are confident that a group dedicated to rehabilitating the historic East Street home could be assembled. The state, which owns the Russell Allen House, has been spinning its wheels on redevelopment for about 50 years. 

In 2003, the 13,000-square-foot mansion was estimated to cost around $4 million to rehabilitate. Today, that number is expected to be at least doubled.  

"I think that this is a group effort," City Planner Kevin Rayner told the Historical Commission earlier this month. 

"We need to talk with the state. If the state wants to make a map forward, that map doesn't start with dumping the property on the city. That map starts with working with the city to rehabilitate the property as a partner." 

Now owned by the state's Division of Capital Asset Management and Maintenance, it was built by the son of Thomas Allen, who underwrote the construction of the Berkshire Athenaeum, and was the great-grandson of Thomas Allen, Pittsfield's first congregational minister.

The Historical Commission received more than $33,200 in Community Preservation Act funding for a feasibility study on the 1886 home, said to be "the finest example of Queen Anne design in Pittsfield and one of the finest in Berkshire County." Now, its bones are showing in several places, and windows are boarded up. 

The $42,500 feasibility study done by Finegold Alexander Architects was funded in the city's $526,548 CPA budget for fiscal year 2025. The rest of the cost was covered by the Berkshire Historical Society. 

"This study hopefully will be able to tell us what really needs to be done. We can all collectively make a determination," said Lesley Herzberg, the historical society's executive director. 

"We obviously want to see this building saved, everybody does, but it comes with a pretty big price tag, we all know." 

The study will assess the building's condition, determine its repair costs, and explore possibilities for reuse. It was suggested that a Friends of the Russell Allen House type group lead any effort that comes out of it. 


Rayner detailed the existing conditions listed in the preliminary executive summary. Images of the home from 2003 and 2025 were displayed to show aging over the last two decades. 

He pointed out that the interior isn't much different from the 2000s, and the lower floors are in better shape than the upper floors. The woodwork is in fairly good shape, he added, and consultants were amazed at how the inside has held up over the years. 

Though outside, the porch is pulling on the main structure, and degradation can be seen from the road. 

"It's a beautiful house, and it's a very salvageable house," Rayner said. "It's not a cheap house to salvage, but it's in really good shape. It's not going to fall apart." 

The city commissioned an outside group for a repurpose study on the Russell Allen House in 1979, and there were studies in subsequent years, but no actions. The home is still being heated, but the state is reportedly pushing to keep it in a cold state, which would drive it into further disrepair. 

Rayner doubts that the city would want to take on an $8 million rehab unless there was some kind of incentive. He sees Community Preservation Act funding as a way to get one stabilization project done per year. 

"I think that could go a long way for gradually restoring the building, and if we can get some other kind of funding to add on to that as we go forward, we can start to gradually put this building back online, but the biggest problem with that solution is we have to figure out who owns it," he said. 

"The state, obviously, would be an unwilling holder, but they've held it for 50 years, so I don't know. I think it's time to have a conversation with the state and ask, 'Well, what are you guys willing to do?'" 

The study also examines the cost of relocating the building as a last resort option.

The William Russell Allen House is also listed in Pittsfield's Community Preservation Plan as a significant historical structure. 

Designed by H. Neil Wilson and added to the National Register of Historic Places in 1980, the property is said to be one of the last structures to embody the look of East Street in the late 19th century. For many people's lifetime, it has sat abandoned between the Registry of Motor Vehicles and Providence Court, the former St. Luke's Hospital. 


Tags: CPA,   historic buildings,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories