image description
The Wagon Wheel Inn was gutted by fire last Friday, leaving 13 people without accommodations or belongings.

Wagon Wheel Inn Fire Still Under Investigation

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

LENOX, Mass. — The Friday morning fire that gutted the Wagon Wheel Inn is still under investigation, and several people who were living at the motel have moved to another one. 

The Fire Department received a report of the blaze around 6:15 a.m. on Friday, and it took hours to bring it under control, with numerous county fire companies responding. The Route 7 highway between Holmes Road and the Lenox shopping plaza was also closed, and traffic was rerouted. 

On Wednesday, Fire Chief Robert Casucci said no cause has been determined at this time, and investigators from the State Fire Marshal's Office and the property's insurance company are still working on it. 

From the street, the decades-old inn is missing much of its roof, and the structure is thoroughly charred.  It is secured by a chain link fence. 

"The loss amount to the Wagon Wheel hasn't been determined as of yet; I would not be surprised to find that it is deemed a total loss," Casucci responded to an email inquiry from iBerkshires. 

"There was no damage to any other surrounding properties." 

Several residents warming up at Market 32 on the day of the fire said they were long-term tenants of the motel and had lost everything. Thirteen people were believed to be staying at the motel, and a person named Ed reportedly knocked on doors to wake everyone so they could evacuate. 

Casucci reported that some residents accepted assistance from the Red Cross and relocated to the Howard Johnson by Wyndham hotel down the street. The town of Lenox made provisions for two nights at the Howard Johnson for all occupants of the Wagon Wheel, but some residents chose to make other arrangements, he said. 


A GoFundMe page has raised more than $1,000 for Edward Lawrence, the man who was living at the motel when the fire broke out and notified fellow inhabitants of the impending danger. 

"The building and all his belongings were destroyed in the fire. What you may not know is that Ed was the one who woke up all the residents and got them out safely," the GoFundMe reads. 

"He had a motel room the first night after the fire, but nothing set up afterwards." 

An occupant of the motel said they thought the fire started in the laundry room and that no alarm went off until after everyone was out. There were no injuries reported at the scene. 

Casucci confirmed that the fire alarm was not sounding when firefighters arrived, and that witnesses reported not hearing an alarm. It is currently unknown if the lack of alarms is because of a malfunction caused by the fire or if the system was not functioning prior to the fire, he reported. 

The property was inspected by the town's fire and building departments in June 2025, and no deficiencies were noted. 

On Friday, Mazzeo's Italian Market and Deli and Berkshire Mazda closed to the public because of proximity to the fire but opened for firefighters and motel residents to warm

According to GIS information, the motel is owned by Rath Hospitality LLC, and the total taxable value is about $733,000. It opened in 1953.


Tags: motels, hotels,   structure fire,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories