Pittsfield Schools Falling Behind on Attendance

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Pittsfield Public Schools' "scary" attendance rates fall below the state average, and the district is trying to determine the root causes so they can be addressed. 

"Really, there's only one or two districts, Holyoke is one, that is higher than us, but there aren't a lot of full districts that rank higher than Pittsfield," Jennifer Stokes, assistant superintendent for school transformation and accountability, said after reporting that Pittsfield schools are listed as 14th in the state for chronic absenteeism. 

This was presented during Wednesday's School Committee meeting. Interim Superintendent Latifah Philips said it's essential to examine these challenges and determine why Pittsfield students are missing so much school. 

"As I continue with my entry planning, reviewing data, I am preparing to make a recommendation for something we should do for next year, and then that will also be aligned with the budget recommendation," she said. 

Chronic absenteeism is defined by 10 percent absences, which translates to 18 absences per student in a 180-day academic year. These include excused absences, unexcused absences, and suspensions. 

Stokes forewarned that the data was tough to look at before displaying a chart with chronic absenteeism rates between 2019 and 2025. Last school year, 38.6 percent of Pittsfield students were chronically absent, and 48.6 percent of students with disabilities were chronically absent. 

This is more than double the state's rate of 18.8 percent; 26.5 percent for students with disabilities. 

For the 2025-2026 school year, PPS has an 89.4 percent cumulative attendance rate, below the 92 percent goal. Only Allendale, Capeless, Williams, Egremont, and Stearns elementary schools are meeting the district's attendance goals as of October's end. 

"The attendance data is pretty scary to look at and very concerning," Stokes said. "So we want to really dig into what is the root cause of the attendance problem in Pittsfield." 



The district has coordinated focus groups to further analyze the data. They will see how absenteeism varies across students and timeframes, identify contributing factors, how existing policies and supports address (and don't address) attendance challenges, and how stakeholders define success in reducing absenteeism. 

Every school has an attendance team that meets weekly, and there is a weekly district-level team that pulls data for students who are at risk for attendance problems, Stokes reported, as well as community partnerships. 

Chair William Cameron said this almost has to be looked at student-by-student.  He commended this as an important study, recognizing that it will take a lot of work. 

"I don't think there's a reason they don't [attend school.] I think there are 100 reasons," he said. 

"Every student may have a different reason based on their own experience in school, out of school, and so to try to figure out a strategy for improving attendance, I don't think there's a one-size-fits-all strategy here. I think this is a great project to work on, but it is going to be labor-intensive." 

Phillips said it is also important to look at attendance by grade level. 

"Because at the elementary level, you're relying heavily on the parent transporting the students, so we need to understand where is the challenge there. Middle and high, there's much more independence," she said, explaining that there could be patterns within the different age levels. 

Cameron added that students who stop going to school regularly around 6 or 7 years old are "much more likely to run into all kinds of problems, including attendance issues, as they get older." The problem, he said, is that the issue spans across the entire district.

He stressed the importance of acclimating students in the lower grades. 

PPS Absenteeism by Brittany Polito


Tags: absenteeism,   Pittsfield Public Schools,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories