Dalton Planning Board members work to clarify plans submitted by Berkshire Concrete for a special permit for excavation. The proposal has drawn opposition from neighbors who have complained about dust and debris. The hearing was continued to next month.
Citizens rise in opposition to the permit; the board also read out 32 letters it received asking it reject the permit. Laughter accompanied the board's asking if anyone wished to speak in favor.
About 100 people attended the public hearing in Nessacus Middle School.
Berkshire Concrete's attorneys look through their paperwork.
DALTON, Mass.— Berkshire Concrete needs to provide more updated, accurate, and clear plans for the Planning Board members to feel comfortable approving its special permit.
More than 100 people attended a public hearing on Wednesday at Nessacus Regional Middle School to voice their concerns about Berkshire Concrete's request for a special permit.
During the meeting, which lasted more than three hours, board members expressed confusion around Berkshire Concrete's plans, due to inconsistencies in the documentation and its vagueness.
Berkshire Concrete, a subsidiary of Petricca Industries, is requesting a renewal of its current permit and requests continued excavation on the unauthorized dig site on parcel 105-16, part of which has since been partially mitigated, and continues the work up towards Renee Drive, on parcels 101-25 and 105-12.
Berkshire Concrete's attorney, Dennis Egan Jr., of Cohen Kinne Valicenti & Cook LLP, highlighted the history of the organization's special permit dating back to 1992 and explained how the permit applies to the entire approximately 200-acre parcel.
"Courts nationwide have ruled that in the context of graveling, mining, because of the nature of the use it's understood that it would progress and not just take place in one particular area," he said.
In this case, the application includes the parcel 105-16, which has been subject to reclamation due to the clerical error.
"When you operate a business, an operation over several decades, missteps are going to happen," Egan said.
"I don't think the measure as to whether a property owner is respectful of the town or its neighbors is whether or not the missteps happen. I think the measure is how that's responded to, how the property owner responds."
Egan demonstrated how in March of 2025, when the Board of Health issued a cease and desist order due to sand blowing off Berkshire Concrete's site, they immediately contacted him and promptly contacted a reclamation consultant and implemented a reclamation plan.
Additionally, Berkshire Concrete has had ongoing communications with the town, including multiple site visits with town officials and representatives, Egan said.
Egan acknowledged that a mistake was made and Berkshire Concrete owns it.
"None of the operations were illegally done. There was a simple oversight, a mistake. I think all parties thought that parcel 105-16 was permitted," he said.
"It was, in fact, not permitted ... again, Berkshire Concrete owns it, and put into place that reclamation plan. Listened to the concerns of the town people and the boards."
During the meeting, the board had Town Planner Janko Tomasic read all the 32 letters the town has received, all of which express disapproval for the proposed special permit.
When asked if anyone in the audience would like to comment in favor of the permit, the room remained silent, aside from several chuckles from audience members.
The letters and comments from residents reiterated what has been said at several meetings — that the dust is a nuisance, and believed to be, by residents, an environmental concern and health risk.
Based on all the letters and no one speaking in favor of the permit, "it's clearly obvious that the majority, if not everybody in this town, has an issue with this. That they want you to deny this," resident Michael Hill said.
In response to the dust, residents established the Clean Air Coalition to provide updates on what they described as slow progress towards a resolution. This is separate from the town's Clean Air Committee.
Clean Air Coalition member Lisa Pugh said Egan's statement that missteps are not a measure of good behavior; actions are, is accurate and proves the residents' points.
"When we have a history going back decades, that's more than just a mistake and to say missteps are not a measure of good behavior, but the reaction to those are — that is exactly true. I think that we have seen tonight, the reaction to those missteps, the lack of reaction," she said.
"So, he has proved his point to us beautifully. So, thank you for making that statement, because it has been proven tonight that your reaction to those missteps has been woefully inadequate."
She said Berkshire Concrete received a cease-and-desist order in February and if it was concerned about the missteps, it would have been mitigated then.
Egan confirmed during the meeting on Wednesday that Berkshire Concrete has appealed this determination.
"If they were truly acting in good faith, truly wanting to do the right thing, they would not be mincing words and hiding behind legal precepts. They would be doing the right thing," Pugh said.
Berkshire Concrete mined parcel 105-16 off Bridle Road without a valid permit from December 2022 until spring 2025, Select Board member Tony Pagliarulo said.
Pagliarulo said the map of 105-16 was nearly illegible, and that Berkshire Concrete included other parcels that had been routinely mined over the decades but omitted 105-16. However, six months later, in July 2023, he said, they filed a notice of intent with the Conservation Commission correctly listing 105-16 but failed to list the parcel in its special permit applications to the Planning Board for the following two years.
"To be kind, what I've just described, I find highly irregular," Pagliarulo said, and that during that time, dozens of trees were taken down and thousands of cubic yards of earth was removed.
"Acres of exposed and unprotected landscape proved right for westerly winds to blow dirt and dust regularly upon our neighbor's adjacent property contaminating the air they breathe," he said.
"It was only through our neighbors' repeated complaints did this situation come to our community's attention."
Pagliarulo highlighted the ongoing steps the town has taken to address the issue and that this past summer Berkshire Concrete initially agreed for the town to collect sand samples — permission that has since been withdrawn.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.
Your Comments
iBerkshires.com welcomes critical, respectful dialogue. Name-calling, personal attacks, libel, slander or foul language is not allowed. All comments are reviewed before posting and will be deleted or edited as necessary.
No Comments
BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule
By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.
Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.
Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.
The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some.
"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.
A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.
Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.
"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."
The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.
"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.
"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also."
Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.
In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.
Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.
Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.
"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.
Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.
"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.
The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the grant conditions were properly followed.
Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.
The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal. click for more
The town election is less than a month away and, unlike recent ones, all open seats are uncontested, with even a vacancy remaining on the Planning Board.
click for more