Pittsfield DPW Seeks $15.2M for Wastewater Plant

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Department of Public Works is requesting the  City Council authorize borrowing up to $15.2 million for improvements to the wastewater treatment plant. 

On Thursday, the City Council referred the request to the Finance subcommittee. Funding would support a new administration and laboratory building at the plant. 

"The existing Laboratory Building, initially constructed in 1938 and adapted for plant use in 1973, no
longer meets current needs," Commissioner of Public Works and Utilities Ricardo Morales wrote in a communique to the council. 

"Together with inadequate administration facilities, the proposed building will address many issues currently affecting the proper management and operations of the facility." 

Mold, layout issues, rodents, ineffective air conditioning, and insufficient lab space were cited as conditions that necessitate the project. This means samples have to be sent to external labs, causing delays, while the new lab will allow same-day analysis. 

Morales explained that this will enhance operational efficiency and reduce nutrient loads to the Housatonic River.

"Due to the limited bench and hood space and insufficient locations of electrical receptacles in the existing laboratory facility, samples that are taken for nitrogen and phosphorus measurements are sent to an outside laboratory for analysis, with the results being available days or weeks after the sampling event, which severely hampers process control," the request reads. 

"The time lag between sample collection and access to the data prohibits the use of the data for operational control and optimization of nutrient removal." 

The design is complete, and Kleinfelder has been contracted for bidding. Market volatility and supply chain issues have presented bidding challenges in the past, as the project was advertised for bids in March and July of 2022, and both received one bidder that was over budget. 

With authorization, bidding would occur this winter with construction expected in the spring and summer of 2026. Construction and remaining engineering services are estimated to cost $15,225,000.


In 2023, Eversource came to Pittsfield to deliver a $140,000 check for the wastewater treatment plant's energy-saving makeover that began in 2020. 

With lighting upgrades, heat pumps, variable frequency drives on heating, ventilation, and air conditioning equipment, aeration ammonia controls, new aeration blowers, and a compressed air mixing system, the plant saw an annual reduction of 560,000 kilowatt-hours of energy consumption. In 13 years, the upgrades are expected to save 6.8 million kWh.

This is not the only public utilities project that the city is looking into. 

Last month, the Department of Public Works presented plans to improve the city's two water plants, Cleveland and Ashley, which were built in 1985. At the October 27 meeting, Morales explained that he wanted the council to be aware of the city's infrastructure needs and challenges.

"Upgrades are required at both facilities to allow the city to achieve regulatory compliance with the Safe Drinking Water Act, reestablish the capacity that the plants were originally designed for, provide redundancy with the equipment, improve the reliability of the water that the city is putting into the distribution system, improve the operability of the facility to make it more operator friendly for the plant operators," said Doug Gove, of AECOM. 

"And then to address maintenance challenges that are ongoing right now, a lot of which are due to the fact that the equipment has passed its useful life, and there are no spare parts for all the equipments that are up there." 

The team recently wrapped up a concept and will move forward with a preliminary design and cost estimate. 

Morales said the project is a massive undertaking for the city and for the enterprise fund. Planners hope to have a funding request to get the project to 100 percent design over the next year. 

"Understandably so, we are preparing our finances to be able to take on something like this," he said. 

"At the moment, there's no number that we can just say this is what we need to go for, and that's why we're not just presenting something to you tonight." 


Tags: municipal borrowing,   wastewater,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories