Pittsfield Hub Program Has Served 85 'High Risk' People

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Pittsfield Hub has served 85 people since its establishment in 2022, and the need continues. 

Last week, Lindsay Cornwell of the Berkshire County Sheriff's Office updated the Homelessness Advisory Committee on the program. Chair Kim Borden said the committee was "very aware of the vital role the hub plays, and can continue to play in our community."

The Pittsfield hub is a team of designated staff from community and government agencies that meets weekly to address specific situations involving clients facing elevated risk levels and develops a mediated, coordinated, and integrated response to the mobilization of resources. (North Adams has a hub, as well.)

"We do not perform case management. Its purpose is to mitigate risk within 24 to 48 hours and connect individuals and families to services. The case management basically belongs to the agencies that are involved in assisting folks in the particular situations in which they are assigned," Cornwell explained. 

"We work with families, we work with individuals that are facing complex challenges, and many need services from more than one community agency. So ultimately, it's nice because we have a whole slew of service providers. I think we have roughly 25 to 30 service providers sitting at this table who contribute to providing case management to folks depending on their specific needs." 

In three years, the program has served 85 individuals. Cornwell pointed out that about six months of early data from before she ran the hub are not included in those metrics. 

The group meets every Thursday, and has so far served 39 females and 46 males from preteens to seniors. This program is modeled after one created by the Chelsea Police Department and uses the same training company.


"For all 85, the top risk factors were housing, mental health, physical health, criminal involvement, and substance use disorder," Cornwell reported. 

"Other common risk factors included basic needs, alcohol-use disorder, unemployment, crime victimization, threats to public safety, and public health." 

The hub aims to eliminate silos and get everyone at the same table, literally. The goal is to get a person out of acute elevated risk within 24 to 48 hours, which could mean assisting an unhoused individual with sheltering, or helping a victim of domestic violence access the Elizabeth Freeman Center. 

"It's mitigating that immediate risk, and then working towards case management after that, with the agencies who are involved in assisting the person," she said. 

The group frequently runs into challenges with pinpointing people without an address or cell phone.  Last week, there were three new situations presented to the hub, and one was still open from the week before. 

"It's not foolproof. Doesn't always work. People relocate. People tell us to kick rocks," Cornwell said. 

"Again, this is something that's here to help people, and we do the best that we can. I will say, in a lot of instances and in most, people are willing or at a point where they're like, 'I need help, and I just don't know where to start,' and so this is a really great place for people in that instance."


Tags: homeless,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories