image description
Parks Manager James McGrath explaining the planting plan to prevent erosion at Pontoosuc Lake during a recent site visit.

Pontoosuc Lake Shoreline Access Plan Tabled for Revisions

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Conservation Commission has requested another plan to improve access on the south shoreline of Pontoosuc Lake while stabilizing the bank. 

Last week, a modified planting plan from the Parks Commission was tabled.  The conversation is now centered on how to use alternative erosion controls from the shrubbery that was planted to balance stabilization and access. 

"Moving forward, you're going to have to submit a plan to address the erosion and the issues," Chair James Conant said to Parks, Open Space, and Natural Resources Manager James McGrath, representing the city. 

"If the issue is planting because people can't get in front of the plants to go fishing, I don't know exactly. I don't understand the whole thing. I still think there's access there to fish. But in any case, if we are not allowed to use planting to stabilize the bank, then we have to come up with another technique, and that's the responsibility of the applicant." 

Commissioner Stephanie Storie added that it also impacts the ability to use the bank. 

"A lot of what we looked at, you're not gonna be able to stand there without falling in the water either, even if we do want it to be able to be used for the recreational uses," she said. 

"So stabilizing it benefits the lake and also the people that want to keep using it, because if that undercut continues, there's no fishing. There is not doing anything there." 

The Parks Commission endorsed a modified planting plan in September after community members argued that shoreline plantings were impeding access for fishers and swimmers. Bank stabilization is part of a larger project to improve the park’s ecological and recreational facilities. 

In October, the ConCom held a site visit on the southern shoreline in preparation to consider modifying its wetland permit. The plan endorsed by the Parks Commission proposed four easy access points along the nearly 1,000-foot stretch. 

Resident Daniel Miraglia said this shoreline has been heavily used for recreational activities over the last 80 years. 

"As far as looking at the issues at hand, I firmly believe that the project lacked a lot of things from the beginning, so I'm looking for a way that the commission could move forward to mediate, to allow an amendment to the order with an order of conditions attached, that speaks directly to allowing open areas of the lake to be used for fishing, access, for picnicking, etc, with a management plan for stabilization of the inland bank," he said during public comment. 

"I’ve said it before, that to try to cluster plant the bank is probably the wrong idea for a shoreline in that particular area that takes high wind, and it takes constant boats going up and down. There are other ways to stabilize the bank, rather than cluster planting, and that's using a membrane or netting and meshing to encapsulate areas of the bank. So if an amendment could be placed that open areas would be allowed for access with bank stabilization in the plan." 

He said the access area is within 50 feet of the boat ramp, and that the Public Access Board doesn’t allow fishing and swimming within that space. 

"We've got one area that you agree upon that there's not an issue, but the shoreline is almost three football fields long, how do we gain some more access for the public to utilize, once again, a shared lake and a shared interest on a shoreline that belongs to the Commonwealth and the shoreline is equally shared by the Park Commission?" he said. 



"So I'm just hoping that you guys can come up with something and approve the plan that's in front of you from the Parks Commission." 

Commissioner Jonathan Lothrop said he would be okay if the first area, next to the boat launch, remained open because it is shallow and without much degradation. However, he said there was significant bank erosion in the other areas that need to be addressed. 

"It's a bank stabilization plan, like that was the purpose of it. There were other things that were done, but at the end of the day, it seems to me like if we just let that go, we are undercutting what the intent of the plan was, ultimately," he said. 

"I understand there are other concerns, and with this lake, as you well know, there are many uses. You can't swim in every spot, you can't boat in every spot, you can't fish in every spot, you can't walk in every spot. Primarily, our job is to engender water quality at this property, at this lake, at this facility." 

Commissioner Thomas Sakshaug agreed. 

"I think we need to have a plan to take care of those bank areas that are being eroded, whether that's heavy native stone or some biodegradable logs or something that will preserve that shoreline as much as we can," he said. 

Conant added that the last site near the boardwalk was under "severe crisis" because of the erosion, and it is the commission’s charge to protect the quality of the lake and its water. 

"This is still going to have to be addressed, and so the conversation will continue," he said. 

Karen Kalinowsky, candidate for at-large councilor, said something needs to be done about the erosion, "but I also think that the lake has been used for years. I mean, I've lived here all my life." 

"Not just for fishing, but for swimming. People walk their dogs and let their dogs swim in the area. It's very easy to access the water at this time," she said. 

"I know there are plans to make a swimming area, but parents with small children would not be able to use it, because if you walk down those steps into the water, the water is at least my waist height, the last time I went in there. So somebody with a 2-3-year-old would not be able to access the lake at all." 

Conant clarified that the ConCom is not the applicant for the plan, and the city will have to come forward with amendments for the commissioners' review.


Tags: conservation commission,   Pontoosuc,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories