image description
The 600-square-foot mall has been deteriorating for years. The Select Board says it has become an attractive nuisance and needs to be demolished.

Lanesborough Officials Urge Demo of Berkshire Mall for Safety

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Select Board wants the Berkshire Mall property to be secured but the owners continue to cite the Baker Hill Road District as their roadblock for further action. 

On Monday, the board had a tense conversation with JMJ RE Holdings about safety concerns brought forward by the police. Principal Jay Jones agreed to apply for demolition permits, and the 600,000-square-foot mall is estimated to cost as much as $7 million to take down. 

Chief Robert Derksen reported that there has been more vandalism, dozens of break-ins, with at least half resulting in arrest, and vehicles are being damaged by deteriorating road and parking lot around the mall. 

"And recently, within the last, say, two to three weeks, it seems it's been a gathering point for these kinds of underage teenage parties," he said. 

"They get chased out of Pittsfield, and then they end up on the backside of the mall property and just gathering, and two of them resulted in some pretty large-scale fights that we had to respond to along with the ambulance, and also had charges as a result of those." 

It's also been a target for "urban spelunkers," people who explore abandoned buildings, who have posted videos of their trespasses into the mall. 

Jones said the problems are not new, and a fence, filling potholes, or turning on the lot lights would be ineffective and cost hundreds of thousands of dollars.  

"The solution is to tear it down, not spend $200,000 or $300,000 more or half a million dollars on a fence, so we will apply for the permits. We will do everything that's necessary to move that progress forward," he said. 

"Other than that, the people, they're not little kids over there. These are teenagers. You're not talking about preschool kids, kindergarten. You're talking about people coming in and committing acts of vandalism, which is something that falls within the peripheral of what the police normally do. They respond to it." 

He said the corporation is trying to develop the mall, and the taxation on the property is why nothing has been done yet. 

"Anytime you're doing a development, most of the time, most cities and towns, they're helping you with tax incentives or all kinds of other things to increase the tax base," Jones said. 

"We have major developers, Fortune 500 company developers, and you know what keeps coming up every day? The Baker Hill Road District." 

The road district, an independent municipal district within Lanesborough, is in litigation with JMJ over unpaid taxes for the Route 7/8 Connector Road. JMJ argues it is being over-billed and underrepresented. Select Board members insist that they wanted to talk about the safety concerns, not the road district, but the mall's project team say the road district it is the reason there has been inaction on the property. 


When asked if the police see a solution, Derksen explained that it's not in his realm of expertise and that it would be best addressed by the owner. 

In August, JMJ announced its collaboration with Integritus Healthcare to redevelop the shuttered mall into campus-style senior housing that includes supportive and ancillary retail space. Jones said they are still in the process of negotiating with developers. 

"Tonight, we're here to talk about what's going on at the mall, the vandalism that's being done over there, the kids, whatever they're doing over there. There's holes in the road. There's one part of the road that's actually sunk in, and I believe that's part of the ring road," Chair Deborah Maynard said. 

"We've seen nothing from you, from any of you, as to what's going to happen with that mall. You keep saying, get rid of ...  We aren't going to do anything. OK. We want you to take care of the vandalism and the property over there, and if you need to demolish it, please apply for the permits and demolish it so that at least we can have some safety precautions back. That is my opinion." 

Consultant Timothy Grogan, of the Housing Development Corp., countered Maynard's statement that they haven't done anything and said the team has been in contact with the town administrator and working with a small group on the road district situation. 

"When your taxes are five times as high as any other property besides for the Target in the town, it's really difficult to get financing," he later said, referring to the Target department store that is in a separate building but attached to the mall. 

"We have said it time and time again. The development feasibility of this property is going to be defined by the Baker Hill Road District, and you don't want us to talk about it, I'm sick of talking about it, but that's the fact on the ground." 

Select Board member Michael Murphy said people, including the town's police officers, are putting their own lives in danger walking through the mall. 

Murphy said that he did a ride-along with a Lanesborough police officer a couple of weeks ago. 
 
 "We drove around that building, Jay. That building is a disaster," he said.
 
He asked Jones if he is familiar with the state's attractive nuisance doctrine that holds property owners liable if a child trespasser is injured by a hazardous artificial condition on their property.

"To prove an attractive nuisance claim, the property owner must have known, or should have known, that children were likely to trespass, that the condition posed an unreasonable risk of serious harm to children, that children would not realize the danger, and that the owner failed to take reasonable steps to eliminate the danger," Murphy said. 

"Common examples include unfenced swimming pools, refrigerators left outside without the door being removed, and construction sites. I believe that description applies to your mall right now." 
 


Tags: Berkshire Mall,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories