Column: What the Shutdown Means for Berkshire County Residents

By Deborah LeonczykGuest Column
Print Story | Email Story
 
Across Berkshire County, the federal government shutdown is creating growing concern among  residents who depend on essential programs for food, heat, and stability. While the impact may seem distant to some, it is being felt acutely by low-income families, seniors, and individuals who are already struggling with high costs of living.
 
This is not a political issue. It is a human one. When federal funding stops, the programs that keep households fed, warm, and stable are thrown into uncertainty.
 
Energy assistance is one of the most urgent concerns. In a rural county with long, cold winters and an aging housing stock, fuel assistance through the Low Income Home Energy Assistance
Program (LIHEAP) is a lifeline. Families who rely on deliverable fuels such as oil, propane, or wood cannot receive deliveries during the shutdown because federal funds are on hold. Those with utility heat are protected under the state's winter moratorium, but households dependent on fuel deliveries are not.
 
Recognizing the severity of this crisis, the Massachusetts Executive Office of Housing and Livable Communities (EOHLC) has stepped in with emergency support. The agency announced the release of more than $500,000 in LIHEAP funding specifically for Berkshire County
residents facing heating emergencies. At an average delivery cost of about $400 per household, this will allow roughly 1,250 families to receive a limited delivery of about 100 gallons of fuel oil — just enough to keep homes warm temporarily while federal funding remains frozen.
 
The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is another area of concern. Thousands of Berkshire County households rely on SNAP benefits to buy groceries, especially during the
winter months when heating costs rise. A prolonged shutdown could delay or reduce benefits, placing additional pressure on local food pantries that are already serving record numbers of visitors each month.
 
To help offset the strain, Gov. Maura Healey announced $4 million in state funding for food pantries across Massachusetts. This emergency investment will provide crucial relief for the organizations working on the front lines of hunger, including many right here in Berkshire County. The additional funding will help replenish pantry shelves, expand capacity, and ensure that families who face delays or reductions in SNAP benefits can continue to put food on the
table. It represents an important show of leadership and partnership at a time when state support is needed most.
 
Other essential programs remain frozen, including the Community Services Block Grant (CSBG), which sustains agencies such as the Berkshire Community Action Council. CSBG funding supports a range of locally tailored initiatives, including emergency food and clothing for children, free tax preparation, financial education, and assistance for those facing housing and employment instability. Without it, the ability of local agencies to respond quickly to community needs is sharply reduced.
 
Despite these challenges, the Berkshire community continues to demonstrate resilience.
 
Donations to emergency fuel funds are arriving, and volunteers, faith groups, and local businesses are stepping up to fill the gaps. BCAC's ELF Children's Warm Clothing Program remains secure this year thanks to generous community support, ensuring that children will have coats and boots even in the midst of uncertainty.
 
Still, the broader picture is clear. The shutdown is more than an administrative pause; it is a direct threat to the health and stability of thousands of Massachusetts residents. For families, it means anxiety about food, heat, and security as winter approaches.
 
Berkshire County has always met crisis with compassion and cooperation, but community generosity cannot replace federal investment. State support provides essential stopgaps, yet the need far exceeds available resources. 
 
BCAC and its partners will continue to assist residents for as long as possible, but long-term stability depends on the swift restoration of federal funding. Every delay compounds hardship for families living on the edge.
 
What happens in Washington may feel far away, but its effects are deeply local. Each day of inaction ripples through our community, into food pantries, fuel tanks, and family homes. As always, the Berkshires will stand together, but we must also speak with one voice for the people who cannot wait.
 
Deborah Leonczyk is executive director Berkshire Community Action Council.

 


Tags: BCAC,   shutdown,   SNAP,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories