image description
Archtop Fiber founder Shawn Beqaj apologized for the miscommunication with residents over digging up the streets to run fiber-optic cable. Archtop and Gateway were approved for installation.

Pittsfield Council Approves Two New Fiber Internet Providers

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Gateway Fiber's Senior Vice President Sarah Lang says the company uses existing infrastructure to run its network. 

PITTSFIELD, Mass.— The City Council has OK'd fiber-optic networks for Gateway Fiber and Archtop Fiber, bringing more options to the city for internet. 

On Tuesday, councilors approved Gateway Fiber's request to deploy an aerial network in Pittsfield and Archtop Fiber's plans to install infrastructure in the city right-of-way. 

Gateway Fiber held a ribbon-cutting at the Colonial Theatre in July to mark the start of construction in Pittsfield. The fiber-optic network will offer subscription plans ranging from $65 to $150 per month, depending on speed

The company serves more than 150,000 homes and businesses in five states and operates Wide Area Networks for school districts in 23 states. 

"While we are growing, we are really focused on local, community, and local partnerships. That's really key to us," Senior Vice President of Market Growth Sarah Lang said. 

She explained that Gateway is using the make-ready process, in which other utilities make room to connect to existing poles. 

"The benefits of aerial are that it's minimally disruptive. We aren't tearing up your lawns, your streets, your sidewalks, and there's added benefits that are make-ready payments," she explained. 

"We've already invested millions of dollars in make-ready, and we're continuing to invest more, and those make-ready payments don't just go to improving the infrastructure for the electric distribution, but they also go to actually lowering rates for ratepayers here in Pittsfield." 

Make-ready payments are what internet service providers pay a utility company to prepare for new attachments. 

Phase one will reach about 5,000 residents and businesses, mostly in Ward 3 and Ward 4. 

"And subsequently, we will continue and move north and build more," Lang explained.

She said communication is key, and cited the company's involvement in community organizations and sponsoring local events, mailings, billboards, and social media posts to inform the constituency. 

"We are looking to triple in size in Massachusetts over the next three years," Lang reported. "Massachusetts is the most important part of our hard work strategy at Gateway, and it's important to note that these are well-paying, stable jobs."

Archtop Fiber's approval came with an advisement to "double down" on communications. At the last council meeting, the petition was continued after a "confusing" permitting process and complaints from residents

Councilors asked for more information from the company and more public outreach to ensure that residents are aware of utility work. 


"We are everywhere all the time, yet, somehow, just 45 or 50 minutes away from my home, we managed to misstep here," Shawn Beqaj, one of the company's founders, said. 

"… We hear you loud and clear. We made that mistake. We will not do it again." 

Vice President Kevin DeLouise, who oversees outside plant design and construction, reported that they have not built another foot underground since the Sept. 9 meeting, and "We have absolutely no desire to be working in your communities against your wishes or through some technicality that we can when there are still such concerns."

Representatives reported the use of mailings and door hangers on streets where work will be.  DeLouise vowed that they will mail directly to nearby residents before starting construction on another street. 

Beqaj said it was a misstep on their part, and they were there to make amends. It was attributed to a "spiral" of permitting challenges with local utilities a couple of years ago, delaying the project's status. 

"From now on, if you judge us by our communication level, we as a group tend to over-communicate," he said about Archtop Fiber, explaining that they are a local team of friends who came up with the idea in Chatham, N.Y., "probably drinking some wine from Guido's while we were thinking through this." 

Archtop is permitted for phase one of its construction plan, which is anchored to Berkshire Medical Center and will expand to the west side of the city. The company plans to deploy a fiber network throughout the rest of the city with a phased approach and will need additional permitting. 

"We're about a third of the way through that $300 million project, and the Berkshires are our next area of focus," Beqaj explained. 

Some councilors were satisfied with the company's second presentation, though some found issues with the quality of maps provided and Archtop's Pittsfield expansion not appearing on the website. City Clerk Michele Benjamin reported that her office was inundated with calls for a competitor, but haven't heard from any streets on this plan. 

DeLouise maintained that 600 mailers were sent out.

Commissioner of Public Services and Utilities Ricardo Morales said the permitting process happened the way it was intended, and "it is the responsibility of the contractor to be aware of the law as well and present this for authorization. " 

He recognized that there are gray areas the city is working through. 

Councilors noted that competition in this area is a good thing, as well as improved connectivity. 

"That was exactly what I needed to hear," Ward 2 Councilor Brittany Noto said, reminding councilors that Archtop will need to be OK'd for any additional permits. 

Ward 4 Councilor James Conant encouraged them to reexamine communication plans and double down. 

"When the phone's ringing the way they ran the last time, that means something's amiss. It's up to you to straighten it out, just making sure you understand that," he said, suggesting a community meeting to inform residents. 

"… I just think you just need to double down."


Tags: Internet,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories