image description
Stearns Elementary has been excluded from the conversations regarding the consolidation of Conte and Crosby schools and will not be part of that project but may be included in the feasibility study in terms of long-range plans.

Stearns Not Currently Included in Pittsfield's Crosby/Conte Proposal

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Stearns is in the zone with Conte and Crosby in the 'three zone' map presented at the last meeting but officials say this does not indicate it will be merged as the zones are not specific.  

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Stearns Elementary School was not included in Crosby/Conte planning documents sent to the Massachusetts School Building Authority. 

This was clarified on Wednesday, before the School Committee endorsed the district and MSBA’s examination of a three-zone, long-term option for reorganizing and consolidating the elementary level.  

"MSBA is not moving forward at this time with a feasibility study that includes any consolidation except the possibility of merging Conte and Crosby at the new school," Chair William Cameron reported after a discussion with the funding authority. 

"That said, MSBA is not averse to having discussions, as part of the feasibility study, of what it would take to realize an objective such as this over an extended period, with the consolidation of Conte and Crosby being the first stage in a multi-stage process." 

The Pittsfield Public Schools are seeking funding for a rebuild and consolidation of John C. Crosby Elementary and Silvio O. Conte Community School on the Crosby property. MSBA is a quasi-independent government entity that helps fund the construction of school buildings. 

At the last meeting, concern arose when it was observed that Stearns Elementary, on Lebanon Avenue, is an outlier and would be absorbed into the new building. The map is based on a rough estimation of the attendance zones, and has been presented at meetings over the past year and a half. 

Cameron said the three zones are not essential to the plan. 

"It could be any number of zones, actually, but we'd like to have an opportunity to discuss with them as the funders for whatever it is that we're talking about long term, how what we're planning to do in the next, say, two or three years, could fit into a larger-scale, longer-term project," he explained. 



Interim Superintendent Latifah Phillips reported that they have until Oct. 31 to validate enrollment numbers for Crosby and Conte. She said the MSBA is "very clear" that the conversation right now is about combining those two schools. 

"And then during the feasibility study, if we provide a letter that we are intending to look at a future redistricting of the district, and we'd like that to be included in the dialogue of the feasibility plan, they will consider it," she added. 

Cameron, taking responsibility, said some people may have left the last meeting with the impression that "it’s a done deal that Stearns is in this consolidation model." 

"It isn't," he said. 

"… Other options may be discussed. There may or may not be a plan emerge, but the intent was certainly not to drop something on people without laying any foundation for where we're going, and I think that impression may have been left, and I want to dispel that. The plan that MSBA is going to work with us on, and that we sought their assistance with, is only for those two schools." 

Committee member William Garrity said the motion gives them the flexibility, as promised when the project began, to have the feasibility study examine this further. 

Vice Chair Daniel Elias said this will put some people’s minds at ease, "and I'm glad that it played out this way, and we're taking a vote tonight on a little different measure." 


Tags: Crosby/Conte project,   MSBA,   Pittsfield Public Schools,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories