Update on Berkshire Mall Expected at Board Meeting

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

LANESBOROUGH, Mass.— There will be some kind of update on the Berkshire Mall at Monday's Select Board meeting. 

Amidst legal action and the mall owners, JMJ RE Holdings, announcing a new health-care partner, the Finance Committee wants to know the possible impact of a 400-unit senior living facility at 655 Cheshire Road on town resources. 

The project team was set for an introductory meeting with town representatives on Wednesday, and an update on the mall restoration effort is expected on Monday. Town Administrator Gina Dario said it's an initial introduction, "But I've gotten no other brief. I think they are trying to establish a connection." 

During last Tuesday's Finance Committee meeting, members raised questions about the proposal and expressed concerns about what they did not know.

"As it is right now, Lanesborough doesn't have a space that's big enough for more than 10 percent of our population to come and vote at one time," member Kristen Tool said. 

"And so we're talking about an increase of 15 to 20 percent of our population. Again, I don't think anyone in this town wants to say, ‘Oh, those are just the seniors that live over there, and they're not part of the community.' That doesn't feel good to me. I don't think it feels good to anyone in this town." 

The Baker Hill Road District is in litigation with JMJ over unpaid taxes for the Route 7/8 Connector Road, and JMJ argues it is being overbilled and underrepresented. 

Officials thought the funding gap might have to be raised through the local tax rate, but that is no longer the case. Though committee members would like to know how town departments would respond to hundreds of new tenants and employees on the shuttered site. 

JMJ has cited a feasibility study that informs its planning, but committee members pointed out that they haven't yet seen these documents and have gotten most of their information from local media. 


"As much as I admire iBerkshires, I don't like getting all my information from iBerkshires," Chair Lyndon Moors joked. 

Last week, JMJ announced its collaboration with Integritus Healthcare to redevelop the shuttered mall into campus-style senior housing that includes supportive and ancillary retail space.

The prior day, the mall owner's consultant Timothy Grogan, of the Housing Development Corp., said the feasibility study was ordered in conjunction with Integritus, and information is considered proprietary.  He said he may be able to provide a summary with the health-care company's permission. 

He said the redeveloped mall would be a "huge tax boon," and imagined those funds would be used to support extra services such as police, fire, and emergency medical services. 

"We don't expect, given the monumentality of this development, to have to foot additional funds in regard to that," Grogan said. 

Committee members agreed that they would hear Monday's update before making requests for information. 

Moors extended an open invitation for the project team to be on the Finance Committee's agenda to talk about matters that are appropriate to their charge. JMJ expects it to take roughly three years. 

"It can only be a what-if at this point anyway, but I think it's a good game to play for a while, to periodically say, 'Based on the current story, what would be the potential impact to your department?' I think that would be helpful, because, like I said, it's not necessarily for budgeting purposes now, but it's for the ongoing conversation," he said. 

"Because a project this size, we're not going to start with the conclusion. It will be an ongoing conversation. And I think these factors are unmentioned, but I think they're important to consider as we move through the process." 


Tags: Berkshire Mall,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories