image description
Loose estimation of where the three elementary zones will fall in Pittsfield after consolidation.

Plan for Merging Pittsfield's Elementary Zones Tabled

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

The current elementary zones. 

PITTSFIELD, Mass.— The School Committee is not ready to adopt an elementary school reorganization plan that moves Stearns students into the proposed Crosby/Conte building. 

On Wednesday, it tabled a long-term, three-zone elementary plan that assumes the Stearns population will be a part of a new school on West Street as early as 2029.  

The city has to determine the building's size, based on enrollments, in its quest for funding from the Massachusetts School Building Authority. Officials say the MSBA also wants to see how the consolidation of the West Side fits into larger plans for the district. 

Based on the attendance map, the Lebanon Avenue school is an outlier and would be absorbed into the new building, which drew some concern.  

"I need time to absorb this and work on it," Vice Chair Daniel Elias said. 

"We've had a lot of discussions. We've had a lot of meetings, and although these zones have been there, there never has been the immediate pressing nature of Stearns going goodbye, and so I think there needs to be an absorption period and a lot of dialogue before we get to that." 

An enrollment review is required to move forward with a feasibility study, Superintendent Latifah Phillips reported. This means that the city has to agree with the Massachusetts School Building Authority on the size of the building. 

She displayed a vision for a lower and upper elementary building with shared facilities from the 2023 school master plan, and a map that condenses eight elementary attendance zones into three: the West Side, the North Side, and the East Side.  

This is expected to run until 2046, and the images have been shared over the last couple of years during district restructuring outreach. The District Master Plan stages the Pittsfield High School renovation for 2029-2036, the Northside School project from 2033-2040, and the Eastside School project from 2039 to 2046. 

"When we make the decision for that building for the West Side, it is a decision for the next 20 to 30 years," Phillips said. 

"And so we want to make sure that we are clear on the future vision so that we can make sure that we build the school properly to meet the needs of the community." 

Chair William Cameron explained that MSBA wants to see a plan for the rest of the city if John C. Crosby Elementary and Silvio O. Conte Community School are consolidated. He emphasized that it is mapped out as a 20-year project and could be amended. 

"We need to be on record as supporting this plan, because at the moment, this plan is what the Crosby/Conte project is tied into," he said. "This is the first step of a three-step project." 



He doesn't think people who have paid attention to the project will be shocked by the visuals, citing the dozen public meetings that were held. The restructuring study was fueled by population decline. 

"I want to emphasize this doesn't mean we're merging these schools. Period. Better plan on it, start packing your books. This is a schematic, still. It is a general plan, it's my understanding, and it doesn't mean we're planning to take your keys and you won't be able to go back to your building next year," committee member Sara Hathaway said. 

"This is a very long-term plan. We don't have the money to replace all these schools, for one thing. We don't have locations to replace them. But the idea is that the state wants to know how many children are in this area, who will be attending in that area in the year 2030 or 2035." 

Mayor Peter Marchetti said that "at best," they would combine the three West Side elementary schools in 2029. Without this plan, he said, they either won't get to the feasibility study or will get into it with a much smaller school and go back to the drawing board. 

School Committee member William Garrity unsuccessfully moved to add "for the purposes of MSBA enrollment projections" to the motion while it was on the floor for approval. 

"I just don't feel comfortable committing to something right now that could not be happening," he said. 

Marchetti made the motion to table, recognizing that the MSBA needs enrollment numbers by the end of October.  

"Would it be feasible for us to table this tonight, go back to MSBA with the concerns that we've heard from some of the school committee members, and see if there's a path forward?" he asked Phillips. 

"Because, I mean, my understanding is, at this very moment, the size of the project depends on where this School Committee goes, or maybe the future of this project decides what happens as we go forward, and I think hearing some of the concerns, we may be not in the right place to be making that decision tonight, and I think we could go back to MSBA and have additional conversations with how strong is that commitment, or could we redesign lines later?" 

She cautioned that the timeline is getting "tight," and the MSBA shared that they want concrete decisions instead of aspirations in order to support a larger building. 

The School Committee meets again on September 17, "and if we don't do it at the next meeting, the project is put off for another 10 years," Cameron said. 


Tags: elementary schools,   Pittsfield Public Schools,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories