Ventfort Hall Executive Director Wendy Healey, left, and Elita Galvin after spilling the tea on The Bible Speaks. The mansion had been used as a restaurant by the fundamentalist organization.
About 60 people attended the talk. The fundamentalist church was headquarted in Lenox during the 1970s and '80s.
Elita Galvin speaks at Ventfort Hall about her time as a child at The Bible Speaks and the podcast she does with her sister about the church.
LENOX, Mass. — A dream made of pure intentions to follow in the word of God turned out to be, for many, served in a poisoned chalice.
Despite the manipulation and exploitation wrapped in a shroud, light still shines through. Buried in the history of the "forgotten cult" is the path to healing. So say two women who had been wrapped up in its inner workings.
Cult survivor Elita Galvin spoke before nearly 60 people at Ventfort Hall at its recent Tea and Talk series, outlining the evolution of the church and its cult-like actions.
Galvin and her sister, Karen Briggs, host the podcast "Children of Grace," in which they research the church's history and hear from fellow survivors — a journey that has become healing.
"I think coming to understand how we got here was hugely helpful in healing, and being able to sort out some of the things that maybe we had been ingrained to think that weren't great and maybe some things that were," Galvin said.
"But then also to hear other people's stories and understand that, while we wouldn't wish our experiences, or worse experiences, on anybody else, there's a comfort in knowing you're not alone and being able to share those stories and experiences with each other. It's like, we've all been able to help each other address our stories and begin the healing process."
A lot of the organization's former members that Galvin and Briggs speak to or are told about were wonderful people who genuinely had a desire to get to know God, help their community, and do good for other people, she said.
"While certainly, there was a fair share of people who may not have had the best intent with what they were doing, a lot of people who did get wrapped up in this, even though they ended up in maybe not the best situation, they were personally there, for the right reasons, and ended up in the wrong place doing it," Galvin said.
The fundamentalist church had its headquarters in Lenox for more than a dozen years until Elizabeth Dovydenas sued founder Carl Stevens and the religious organization for coercion and fraudulent manipulation, winning a $5.5 million judgement. She had donated some $6.6 million to support the church and pay off its Kemble Street property, the former Lenox School for Boys and now the home of Shakespeare & Company. Ventfort Hall had been used as a restaurant.
Stevens made an enterprise out of his claims of being appointed by God, fostering messaging infected by greed and establishing loyalty out of fear, say survivors.
"While he would preach from the pulpit about things such as virtue and chastity, he was reportedly engaging in inappropriate commentary behavior toward women, and was also alleged to have had several affairs prior to his first wife passing away. So, it appears as though quite a bit of time he was not always practicing what he preached," Galvin said.
She illuminated Stevens' decades-long cycle of domineering, tyranny, facing criticism and, at times, fleeing only to begin again under the guise of expansion or making false promises of change.
In his lifetime, Stevens and his church were the spotlight of several scandals. In the early 1980s, Stevens requested an independent report from the Christian Research Institute because "they were trying to ingratiate themselves with some of the other local churches, and were not having a lot of success," Galvin said.
"So they asked them to come in and maybe take a poke around and see if they could help them figure out what the disconnect was and what they could be doing better."
The "very lengthy" report expressed support for the church, "but one of the things they raised the most concern about were the teachings surrounding pastoral authority and loyalty to one pastor teacher, which was Carl," Galvin said.
At first, The Bible Speaks and Stevens praised the report and promised change. However, the reaction was different behind closed doors, she said.
"So, there was a group of concerned people, some of whom were very much involved in the first report, who would reach back out to the Christian Research Institute and ask them if they would come back, because what they were actually hearing from Carl behind closed doors was not at all what was being said publicly," Galvin said.
"And so they came back and they amended the report and had to withdraw a lot of the support they initially had for the church because of what they found."
Some believe this cycle continues today under Stevens' successors or for some at Ventfort Hall, a haunting visit by Stevens, who died in 2008.
"Unfortunately, I just think at this point, I don't know that there's any way to convince them that what they believe for 40 to 50 years is not necessarily accurate, and the way they do things is accurate," Galvin said.
When the church relocated to Baltimore, it was renamed Greater Grace World Outreach, which it is still called today. It has dozens of ministries in the United States, South America, Africa, the Middle East, Europe and Southeast Asia. It no longer has a presence in Berkshire County.
The current church officials are trying to distance themselves from some bad things, Galvin said, but that it continues to operate the way Stevens had trained them, unfortunately, that has come at the expense of the local area.
"When they moved [to Baltimore], the local area was not pleased, and staged quite a bit of protest that ultimately failed, and they continue to be plagued by scandal and by rumor of unethical behavior. To this day, currently, the location is facing five lawsuits for abuse to minors," Galvin said.
(These lawsuits refer to accusations from the 1990s; one former pastor was arrested this week for accusations from when the church was in Lenox.)
The church has subject to a series of investigative articles in the Baltimore Journal (and also The Berkshire Eagle) and is currently undergoing an outside investigation review, which they did hire, admittedly under pressure from outside groups, she said.
"I'm also surprised it's still around. I thought that the church went away in the '80s when this was shut down here. I'm a little shocked, and I'm a little sad that people are still being taken advantage of, it sounds like," attendee Carrie Vibert said.
"I come to the story of The Bible Speaks here through [Ventfort Hall's] ghost tours and the ghost investigations, where sometimes in the investigations, they've had the pastor make his presence known. So, I'm not surprised to hear how evil and greedy he was given what we've learned on those investigations and tours.
"In one of the investigations, there was a heavy presence following us that night, and then all of the other spirits got quiet. He kind of scares everybody else away. Nobody dead or alive wants to deal with him."
As people sold their homes and possessions to bring them God's favors and further the church's mission, Stevens bought "nice cars, helicopters" and "and even some planes," Galvin said
"At one point, it was reported in the local newspaper that The Bible Speaks had filed a request with the Pittsfield Municipal Airport commission for permission to construct a hangar at the airport," Galvin said, and at the time it had two helicopters and a single-engine plane.
"They were looking to construct [a hanger] that could accommodate at least five aircrafts, including three helicopters and two piston engine planes … My understanding from the article is that they were turned down for that request."
Those who gave up everything were promised free housing on church property in return. However, these promises were often not fulfilled, Galvin said.
The fee for on campus housing aligned with the prices in 1976 were $35 per week per person, which included a bed and two or three meals in the cafeteria, she said.
"The amount of devotion that was expected took up a lot of time. And, so the time available to study, to go to every church service and to also go to Bible school classes full time, and then also be able to make a living to support yourself was very limiting for a lot of people, and it was very difficult for a lot of people to make ends meet and to keep up," Galvin said.
Tithing and free will offerings were also expected from the students at the Stevens School of the Bible. Tithing was the 10 percent of one's income before taxes and any deductions.
"It should be 10 percent of the absolute best of your paycheck ... or, as I heard it referred to growing up, the first fruits of your paycheck should immediately go to the Lord and then anything else that wasn't covered from your paycheck, you should trust God to provide," Galvin said.
"And not that I'm saying he can't and I'm sure he did for a lot of people, but that's an awful lot to expect of people."
Galvin and her sister were too young to recognize the facade the church hid behind and, after the talk, described to iBerkshires what life was like living in the organization's campus housing.
"It was a lot of fun," she said because there were families and other kids living together on a very large property, and places to bike, roller skate, sled. "It was a pretty great place to be as a kid."
Hindsight has helped her understand how the church used fear and shame to promote a relationship with God and gain loyalty.
"Which is fine, you can scare somebody into making a choice, but it's not really effective to scare them into a relationship and I think that's where the disconnect happened a lot," Galvin said.
"Over and over again, we weren't sure we did it right, and so we would repeatedly ask Jesus into our hearts because we were scared to death that if we didn't do it right, we'd end up in hell."
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.
Your Comments
iBerkshires.com welcomes critical, respectful dialogue. Name-calling, personal attacks, libel, slander or foul language is not allowed. All comments are reviewed before posting and will be deleted or edited as necessary.
No Comments
BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule
By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.
Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.
Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.
The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some.
"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.
A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.
Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.
"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."
The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.
"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.
"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also."
Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.
In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.
Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.
Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.
"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.
Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.
"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.
The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the grant conditions were properly followed.
Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.
The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal. click for more
The town election is less than a month away and, unlike recent ones, all open seats are uncontested, with even a vacancy remaining on the Planning Board.
click for more