image description
The Licensing Board is questioning the status of the alcohol license for Chili's, which closed a year ago.

Pittsfield Licensing Board Wants Movement on Chili's

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Licensing Board wants to see movement at the former Chili's. If not, it could be forced to revoke the liquor license. 

On Monday, the board continued an update from Chili's Grill and Bar on the status of its alcohol license after a year of closure. The company says there are interested buyers, and the board wants to hear more details at its October meeting. 

The current lease agreement goes out to 2029, and the company, Pepper Dining Inc., is looking for another business to carry it out.

"We do have this mandate from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts that says, if a licensee doesn't operate its business, or, in the alternative, doesn't sell it in a reasonable period of time, what we're supposed to do is cancel the license so that it'll go away and go away forever," Chair Thomas Campoli explained. 

"You guys don't want that to happen, obviously. The City of Pittsfield doesn't want that to happen either." 

Chili's closed abruptly in August 2024 after six years in business. 

In January, the company reported that there were multiple interested parties, but nothing solid. On Monday, representative Jacob August reported that they are "adamant" about selling the Berkshire Crossing location. 


"They did brief me and the team that handles real estate transactions; they were vague in the description, but they were adamant that they are in the process of finding a buyer and talking with them. To the details I can't speak," he said, explaining that the goal is to sell the restaurant and Annual All Alcohol 7-Day license as a package. 

Board member Kathy Amuso said she wanted more information about a time frame. 

"I know you're saying you don't know, but we've been told interested parties for quite a long time," she said. 

The board also discussed allowing wine and malt beverage license holders to trade in for an all-alcohol license, which new state legislation now allows.  

On June 30, Gov. Maura Healey signed an act that allows local boards to allow M.G.L. c. 138, § 12 in premise wines and malt beverages license holders to trade in their license for a non-transferable all alcoholic beverages license. 

"The law says that we can have this process if the local licensing board allows that to happen. We don't have to do this, but we can do this if we want to do it," Campoli explained. 

Because there were some unanswered questions about the number of wine and malt licenses in Pittsfield and the costs to obtain them, the conversation was continued to the next meeting.  


Tags: license board,   alcohol license,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories