The Hidden Struggle: Seniors at Risk in a Changing Climate

By Deborah Leonczyk Guest Column
Print Story | Email Story
Too many older adults in Berkshire County, after a lifetime of work and contribution, now face the hidden struggle of poverty and the growing dangers of a changing climate. At the center of this struggle are the costs of basic utilities such as heat, electricity, and cooling, which determine whether a senior can live in safety or in constant risk.
 
For many older adults, retirement means living on a fixed Social Security check and, in some cases, a small pension. Even combined, these benefits often do not stretch far enough to cover rent, utilities, food, and medicine. When utility bills rise, as they have in recent years, seniors must decide whether to keep the lights on, fill a prescription, or buy groceries. No one should
have to choose between safety in their own home and the essentials of daily life.
 
At BCAC, nearly 60 percent of our clients are seniors. Most never imagined they would need help paying for fuel or electricity. Yet we see it every day: rising energy costs push older adults into heartbreaking choices. Should they heat their homes adequately in January, or risk frozen pipes and dangerous indoor temperatures? Should they run a fan or air conditioner in July, or risk dehydration and heat stroke? Energy insecurity translates directly into threats to health and safety.
 
The homes themselves often compound the problem. Many older adults live in houses that are not only expensive to heat but have fallen into disrepair because the owners cannot afford maintenance and are now too frail to do the work themselves. Drafty windows, broken furnaces, and leaky roofs drive up utility costs and leave residents vulnerable to unsafe conditions. Utility bills soar even higher in inefficient homes, forcing seniors into impossible financial corners.
 
Struggling to make ends meet in retirement isn't just a financial issue, it's a matter of survival.
 
Seniors who can't afford medication, adequate heat or cooling, or timely medical care face declining health and mounting risks. The constant stress of opening a utility bill they cannot pay undermines their mental health as well. Poverty in old age strips away not only comfort but dignity and peace of mind.
 
This past summer, Berkshire County saw record-breaking heat. For older adults, extreme heat is more than uncomfortable — it is life-threatening. Yet many could not afford to run an air conditioner or even a fan for long hours, fearing the next electricity bill. Climate extremes mean that seniors now face two seasons of risk: bitterly cold winters that make heating essential, and dangerously hot summers that demand cooling. Both come with utility bills that their fixed incomes cannot cover.
 
We often think of LIHEAP only as a heating program, but extreme heat is just as dangerous as extreme cold. Policy must reflect that both heating and cooling are essential to safety.
 
Encouragingly, U.S. Sen. Ed Markey has introduced a bill in Congress to increase LIHEAP funding and expand it to include cooling assistance. This legislation would provide a lifeline for all low- to moderate-income families who struggle to afford utility bills, including the many seniors who are at greatest risk in extreme weather. A call to Senator Markey's office to voice support for this bill would be appreciated and could make a real difference.
 
Older adults are the backbone of Berkshire County. They volunteer in schools, churches, and nonprofits like BCAC. They care for grandchildren and share the wisdom that strengthens our community. Yet when utility costs force them into dangerous situations, choosing between fuel and food, or between electricity and medicine, we all feel the loss. Poverty among seniors is not just about individual hardship; it undermines the safety and well, being of the entire county.
 
The good news is that solutions exist. We can fight for policies that protect Social Security, fully fund LIHEAP and CSBG, and expand weatherization and affordable housing programs that reduce utility costs. Locally, we can act by checking in on neighbors and supporting food and fuel programs through volunteering, donating, and advocacy, and by lifting our voices when cuts threaten the safety net. And as summers grow hotter and winters remain harsh, we must also push for programs like Senator Markey's proposal that ensure families and seniors alike have the resources to both heat and cool their homes safely.
 
Growing old should not mean growing poor or living in unsafe conditions because you cannot afford basic utilities. Seniors in Berkshire County have spent their lives working, raising families, and building our communities. Now, they deserve security, respect, and dignity. Making sure every older adult can keep the heat on in the winter and stay cool in the summer is not just about comfort; it is about health, safety, and the values we all share.
 
This column is not meant to carry my voice, but to lift up yours. By sharing your stories, by contacting legislators, and by standing together, we can ensure that seniors and all limited-income families in Berkshire County are heard and protected.
 
Deborah Leonczyk is executive director Berkshire Community Action Council.

 


Tags: BCAC,   climate change,   senior citizens,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories