image description
The city will try to put in more access points on the south side of the renovated Pontoosuc Lake Park after hearing complaints from residents.
image description
A boardwalk runs along the shoreline but doesn't give access to the water.
image description
A proposal to be presented to the Parks Commission would open up about 24 percent of the shoreline.

Pittsfield Looks to Improve Access at Pontoosuc Lake Shoreline

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

A public site visit in July raised concerns about the limited access to the water because of foliage and bank erosion controls. 

PITTSFIELD, Mass.— The city plans to create water access points on the south shore of Pontoosuc Lake Park. 

This comes after community members asserted that bank plantings limited access for swimming and fishing. Because the area is shared with boats, the north side of the park is staged for a formal swimming area with a beach. 

"I think people just need to allow us a little bit of time and afford us a little bit of patience, and we'll get this right," Parks, Open Space, and Natural Resources Manager James McGrath told the Parks Commission on Tuesday. 

He proposed opening up 24 percent of the south shoreline, though it was continued to the next meeting because technical issues prevented the plans from being displayed. More than 1,000 shrubs were planted for bank stabilization as part of a parkwide renovation project that was years in the making. 

"It's either currently open and there was no treatment in that area, or we're proposing that live stakes be removed so that full extent of Pontoosuc Lake shoreline, 24 percent will be open and accessible for fishing, for swimming, or otherwise," McGrath said. 

Several residents attended a site visit to Pontoosuc Lake Park in July that turned combative at times as they passionately voiced their discontent. The Parks Commission then voted to recommend to the Conservation Commission that it consider modifying the current vegetation plan to create additional public access points to the water. 

Commissioner Anthony DeMartino said they looked "very mindfully" for water access points that made sense. 

"I want to be clear that the park project on this side, on the south, has really two facets to it. One was at the public beach that was there was really no longer present or viable. It had become a wetland, and the purpose was to restore some access to the area, but a larger part of this is the bank conservation through the Conservation Commission," he said, adding that the site visit showed that a stormwater drain that used to be in the park is now underwater. 

He said nearly 250 feet is proposed to be opened up between the almost 1,000 feet of shoreline from the boat ramp to beyond the new boardwalk. 


McGrath noted that access points will look like they did previously and cautioned against swimming in the channel shared with boats. 

"If people want to swim there, the city is not saying 'no,' although I do take exception to folks feeling like they can swim in the channel. That is the most unsafe of situations," he said. 

"So to the extent that this commission and the Parks Department discourage swimming in the channel, that's what we're trying to do. The channel is very busy, and it's dangerous for swimming. That's why this whole plan was predicated on creating a new swimming opportunity on the north side. It may not be convenient for some, but we're trying to separate uses within the park and create a safer park which is much more handicap accessible." 

Of the approximately 915-foot shoreline, 52 percent has been deemed excessively eroding and needing the bank plantings, 24 percent is existing vegetation, and the rest will be opened up. 

"The reason we're seeing erosion and bank undercutting is because there was a prior lack of vegetation, and that's why the plan was installed, to create additional bank armoring using the live stake native planting technique," McGrath explained. 

"So there are some areas where we would not propose to remove any of the existing vegetation that was put in as part of this plan." 

Nearby residents Mary and John Dickson said people continue to use the south side for swimming, and safe access has been hindered by the plantings. 

John Dickson said he was glad to see the commission addressing it. 

"I do see people over there. It's nice to see people over there making use of it as was intended, looking at the view, having a cup of coffee, but I also see people who want to swim, and are swimming regardless," he said. 


Tags: Pontoosuc,   public parks,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories