image description
The city will try to put in more access points on the south side of the renovated Pontoosuc Lake Park after hearing complaints from residents.
image description
A boardwalk runs along the shoreline but doesn't give access to the water.
image description
A proposal to be presented to the Parks Commission would open up about 24 percent of the shoreline.

Pittsfield Looks to Improve Access at Pontoosuc Lake Shoreline

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

A public site visit in July raised concerns about the limited access to the water because of foliage and bank erosion controls. 

PITTSFIELD, Mass.— The city plans to create water access points on the south shore of Pontoosuc Lake Park. 

This comes after community members asserted that bank plantings limited access for swimming and fishing. Because the area is shared with boats, the north side of the park is staged for a formal swimming area with a beach. 

"I think people just need to allow us a little bit of time and afford us a little bit of patience, and we'll get this right," Parks, Open Space, and Natural Resources Manager James McGrath told the Parks Commission on Tuesday. 

He proposed opening up 24 percent of the south shoreline, though it was continued to the next meeting because technical issues prevented the plans from being displayed. More than 1,000 shrubs were planted for bank stabilization as part of a parkwide renovation project that was years in the making. 

"It's either currently open and there was no treatment in that area, or we're proposing that live stakes be removed so that full extent of Pontoosuc Lake shoreline, 24 percent will be open and accessible for fishing, for swimming, or otherwise," McGrath said. 

Several residents attended a site visit to Pontoosuc Lake Park in July that turned combative at times as they passionately voiced their discontent. The Parks Commission then voted to recommend to the Conservation Commission that it consider modifying the current vegetation plan to create additional public access points to the water. 

Commissioner Anthony DeMartino said they looked "very mindfully" for water access points that made sense. 

"I want to be clear that the park project on this side, on the south, has really two facets to it. One was at the public beach that was there was really no longer present or viable. It had become a wetland, and the purpose was to restore some access to the area, but a larger part of this is the bank conservation through the Conservation Commission," he said, adding that the site visit showed that a stormwater drain that used to be in the park is now underwater. 

He said nearly 250 feet is proposed to be opened up between the almost 1,000 feet of shoreline from the boat ramp to beyond the new boardwalk. 


McGrath noted that access points will look like they did previously and cautioned against swimming in the channel shared with boats. 

"If people want to swim there, the city is not saying 'no,' although I do take exception to folks feeling like they can swim in the channel. That is the most unsafe of situations," he said. 

"So to the extent that this commission and the Parks Department discourage swimming in the channel, that's what we're trying to do. The channel is very busy, and it's dangerous for swimming. That's why this whole plan was predicated on creating a new swimming opportunity on the north side. It may not be convenient for some, but we're trying to separate uses within the park and create a safer park which is much more handicap accessible." 

Of the approximately 915-foot shoreline, 52 percent has been deemed excessively eroding and needing the bank plantings, 24 percent is existing vegetation, and the rest will be opened up. 

"The reason we're seeing erosion and bank undercutting is because there was a prior lack of vegetation, and that's why the plan was installed, to create additional bank armoring using the live stake native planting technique," McGrath explained. 

"So there are some areas where we would not propose to remove any of the existing vegetation that was put in as part of this plan." 

Nearby residents Mary and John Dickson said people continue to use the south side for swimming, and safe access has been hindered by the plantings. 

John Dickson said he was glad to see the commission addressing it. 

"I do see people over there. It's nice to see people over there making use of it as was intended, looking at the view, having a cup of coffee, but I also see people who want to swim, and are swimming regardless," he said. 


Tags: Pontoosuc,   public parks,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Council OKs Underground Fiber Network

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — More underground fiber internet cables will be installed in Pittsfield. 

On Tuesday, the City Council approved Gateway Fiber's request to install an underground fiber network infrastructure within the city's right-of-way.  

The company was given the go-ahead for an aerial network last year alongside Archtop Fiber, marking the beginning of construction with a ribbon-cutting at the Colonial Theatre. Gateway Fiber will offer subscription plans ranging from $65 to $150 per month, depending on speed. 

Wards 3 and 4 will see the most work in the first phase, according to an underground fiber deployment plan.  Fourteen streets in Ward 4 will see underground fiber deployment; 13 streets in Ward 3.  

Ward 4 Councilor James Conant voted in opposition for personal reasons, as he signed up for Gateway Fiber briefly last year and said he had poor service and poor communication from the company. 

Some councilors and community members appreciated bringing competition to Spectrum internet services. Ward 5 Councilor Patrick Kavey pointed out that it costs about $90 per month for 500 megabytes per second with Spectrum, and that all three fiber services that have come to Pittsfield are cheaper. 

Operations Manager Jennifer Sharick explained that they were seeking approval for underground fiber deployment as part of the next phase in Pittsfield. The city was found to be a "very" viable community for underground fiber. 

Gateway Fiber, she said, originally served a community of 250 residents outside of St. Louis, Mo. 

"Following the pandemic, we saw the need, and what people need for fiber and reliable internet service to bring residents and businesses the opportunity for connectivity," Sharick said. 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories