Report: Miss Hall's Failed to Act on Abuse Reports

By Staff ReportsiBerkshires
Print Story | Email Story
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — A report commissioned by Miss Hall's School found school officials failed for years to follow up on accusations of sexual misconduct by its instructors. 
 
The full report, summary from the Board of Trustees and a letter to the school community from Head of School Julia Heaton and board President Nancy Ault can be found here
 
"The Report makes clear that, over the decades, there were multiple instances in which students were harmed and that MHS failed to investigate adequately or hold perpetrators accountable for their actions," reads a summary of the report released by the board of trustees on Tuesday. 
 
"We would not know the full extent of this harm if it weren't for the courageous Survivors who came forward. We are profoundly grateful to these individuals, and we are simultaneously deeply sorry for all they endured and for the School's multiple failures to address concerns that were raised."
 
Several former students came forward in early 2024 saying a teacher at the girl's boarding school had abused and exploited them. Matthew Rutledge, 62 at the time, was removed from campus and resigned. 
 
Berkshire County District Attorney Timothy Shugrue launched an investigation but no criminal charges were filed as the victims had reached of consent at the time. A bill currently in the Legislature, and supported by the Berkshire delegation, would protect those age 18 and younger from sexual predation by individuals in "positions of trust and authority," like teachers.
 
Shugrue's office requested a copy of the report for review and it was emailed to his office, according Chief of Operations Julia Sabourin. "As previously stated, the Berkshire District Attorney's Office does not formally close cases involving allegations of sexual assault." 
 
She said the DA's Office encourages anyone with information about the misconduct to contact Detective Ignacio Matos of the Pittsfield Police Department at 413-448-9700.
 
The trustees revealed that the school has "resolved legal claims" with several of the abuse victims and "will continue to work toward resolving all the remaining claims." 
 
Miss Hall's School hired Aleta Law, which it said "specializes in trauma-informed investigations of misconduct at schools," to look into not only allegations but the way school staff and administrators responded to incidents throughout its 127-year history.
 
Aleta Law representatives conducted a total of 146 interviews across the school community including students, parents, current and former staff, four heads of school and seven trustees. Among them were survivors, third-party reporters, witnesses, and former employees accused of misconduct.
 
The trustees said the investigators were given full cooperation as well as unfettered access to school materials deemed relevant, such as historical records and correspondence across
nine decades.
 
Findings include five substantiated firsthand accounts of Rutledge's sexual abuse dating to the 1990s; a "preponderance of evidence standard" of reports of misconduct with seven other respondents dating to the 1940s; and at least four individuals showing "boundary crossing behavior." None of these reports involve current employees, according to the report.
 
Regarding the most recent accusations, Aleta found that administrators had been informed on separate occasions of Rutledge's inappropriate behavior and while taking some actions, failed to "adequately respond and properly investigate after seeking advice from the school's former legal counsel." Head of School Julia Heaton, hired in 2013, and board President Nancy Ault became aware of Rutledge's past misconduct from third parties but did not adequately respond, according to the report, until Heaton received the letter in March 2024 from a former student's attorney.
 
"The investigation did not reveal any evidence of sexual misconduct by Rutledge occurring during Heaton's tenure as Head of School, though there was evidence obtained that Rutledge engaged in boundary crossing behavior toward students after 2010 and up to his separation from Miss Hall's," the summary states. 
 
The school engaged Learning Courage in April 2024. The nonprofit works with K-12 school on sexual misconduct and has provided training,policy assessment, an evaluation process, and recommendations on student support.
 
Officials said many of the practices and training are in place or will be by the start of the school year, including a new employee code of conduct and updated misconduct reporting policies.
 
The full report was shared at a closed board of trustees meeting that included a discussion on the future of Heaton and Ault, who had recused themselves. The board voted separately and unanimously to affirm their continued leadership based on their active cooperation with the investigation, their immediate actions following the letter, and their efforts to transform the school's culture toward student well-being.
 
"The Board and I committed to a comprehensive and transparent investigation so that we could learn the full breadth of what happened, take accountability, and begin to move toward healing," wrote Heaton in her letter to the school community. "The investigation revealed horrible truths about a community we hold dear and has brought about personal and institutional reckoning."

Tags: miss halls school,   sex abuse,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories