image description

Pittsfield Cemetery Requests Green Burial Regulations

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Green burials could be another option for burying loved ones in Pittsfield. 

On Wednesday, representatives from the Pittsfield Cemetery and Crematory approached the Board of Health, inquiring about how to offer burials that return a body to the ground after death with reduced environmental impact. "Green" generally means no embalming or use of caskets made with metal or hardwood.

"We've had many requests for the green burials, and I know other places have been approved for them, so we are interested in moving forward with them," said Kim Murray, from the Pittsfield Cemetery on Wahconah Street. 

About 150 communities in the state allow green burials, and Dalton recently approved them at Ashuelot Cemetery.

Director of Public Health Andy Cambi explained that local guidance would need to be created. This involves research on existing regulations in other communities, drafting language, and approval from the board.  He said it could be addressed through internal policies or a formal regulation. 

The cemetery's board President Aking Francis said, "Our purpose tonight is we don't know what the rules are." 

"We know that these green burials are where people are saying, 'We don't want a cement vault, we don't want a metal casket, we don't want embalming. We just want everything as natural as natural can be.' Our concern is from a standpoint of when a person is buried and there is not a vault, the ground does settle over time, so then it becomes our situation where we fill it up again, the top," he said. 

"But also, we have to realize the body has to go down so far, and we just don't know how far that is. We know how much it is with a casket and a vault, but we don't know, are the rules and regulations different with regards to being in a shroud or just a pine box and really nothing else?"



Lee, Great Barrington, Richmond, Stockbridge, and Dalton have approved green burials. Francis suggested consulting those communities to inform Pittsfield's regulations. 

"We want to make sure we do it the right way. That's all," he said. 

The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection recommends that local health boards develop standards and an approval process for green burials that includes a site plan submission, geological evaluation, and setback requirements. 

The state also urges consideration for serious pathogenic disease. 

"Additional consideration should be taken with the remains of individuals that were known to have been killed by a serious pathogenic disease, including highly infectious bacterial and viral diseases and diseases transmitted by prions," Mass.gov reads. 

"Green burial of these infectious cases should not be allowed pending a decision of the local BOH." 

Last year, the board was approached about home green burials, but didn't take any action to develop an ordinance. This is different, Cambi explained, because it would be for cemeteries. 


Tags: board of health,   BOH,   cemetery,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories